Page 231 - Chayei Adam LAYOUT sivan 5782

םדא הכוס יניד “ ו - מק ללכ ייח

ּ
ּ
ּ
יּוא ָּר י ִכ ָּה ואָּל ְּב לָּבֲא .ק ָּח ְּד ַה תַע ְּ ׁש ִב א ָּק ְּו ַד ְּו .תָּּב ַ ׁש ןַיְּנ ִעְּל י ֵּמַנ יֵוֲה הָּּכ ֻס ןַיְּנ ִעְּל
ּ
ֹ
ּ
אל ,ח ַתֶּפ ַה ת ַרּוצ ְּו חַפ ֶט תי ִ ׁשיִל ְּ ׁשּו תֹומֵל ְּ ׁש תֹונָּפ ְּד 'ב ן ִמ תֹוחָּפ ְּב לָּבא ֲ 16 .רי ִמ ְּח ַהְּל
ּ

אי ִה ח ַתֶּפ ַה ת ַרּוצ ְּד בַּג לַע ף ַא ,ח ַתֶּפ ַה ת ַרּוצ י ֵדְּי לַע תֹונָּפ ְּד ַה לָּּכ ה ֶשֲעַי ם ִא יֵּנ ַה ְּמ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ֹ
ּ
ּו ּ ל ִפֲא יֵּנ ַה ְּמ אל הָּּכ ֻס ןַיְּנ ִעְּל םֹוק ָּמ לָּּכמ ִ 17 ,ח"מ לָּל ְּכ ִב ר ֵאָּּב ְּתִנ ֶ ׁש ֹומ ְּכ ה ָּרּומ ְּּג הָּּצ ִח ְּמ
ּ
ּ
ֹ
םי ִחָּפ ְּט 'ג ִמ תֹוחָּ ּפ הֶנ ָּק ל ֶ ׁש תֹוצי ִח ְּמ ןֵכ ְּו .הכוס שיר אידהב ן"ר כ"כ( תֹוּצ ִח ְּמ ר ָּא ְּ ׁש ִב ןֵּכ ֶ ׁש לָּּכ ִמּו ,'ג ןֶפד ְּב
18 : )א"קס א"מב ל"רת 'יס ןייעו ,תֹונָּפ ְּד 'ד ה ֶשֹוע ןֵּכ ם ִא אָּל ֶא ,יֵּנ ַה ְּמ אל
ֹ

ּ
םדו רשב
11a.) This is not true of a succah which must just over two tefachim within three tefachim of
be built of more substantial walls. When a the corner and another similar board within
tzuras ha’pesach is added, such as above, it is three tefachim of it. Tosfos there answers that
only as a chumrah, and not to replace a this is because of the gemara in Eiruvin that a
necessary wall. valid mechitza but be formed of both shesi
and areiv (woven in both directions) except
18. Chayei Adam’s note: So writes the when travelling soldiers encamp. Although
Ran explicitly at the beginning of meseches many of the rishonim echo Tosfos’ answer, this
Succah. Similarly, walls made of reeds is problematic on two counts: First of all, the
placed within three tefachim of each other halacha is in accordance with the opinion that
are not sufficient unless one does so for a mechitza for Shabbos can be constructed of
four walls. See Magen Avraham (630:1) material running in only one direction, either
From the gemara it is clear that a vertical poles, or horizontal ropes placed
tzuras ha’pesach only helps to complete the within three tefachim of each other.
third wall, but is not sufficient for the others. Furthermore, even if we were to assume that
Although for Shabbos and hilchos Kilayim, a the halachos of a succah’s wall is different than
tzuras ha’pesach is considered an adequate those of a mechitza for Shabbos and therefore
mechitza, a succah is different (Ran), perhaps a mechitza made of lavud is not sufficient, the
because it by definition must provide shelter. gemara (7a) seems to imply that a succah
דכ
See next halacha (siman 4) that if the succah is constructed of a series of upright poles is
constructed of two parallel walls, a board kosher as long as the poles are within three
measuring at least four tefachim must be tefachim of each other. In response, the
placed perpendicular to one of the corners Magen Avraham opines that while it is true
within three tefachim of it. Tosfos (Succah 16b) that the walls of the succah are more stringent
questions why it is necessary to add a board and must be complete (i.e. not ‘lavud walls’),
measuring four full tefachim; seemingly, it one may construct a lavud succah if he makes
would be sufficient to place one measuring four full walls. The poskim understand this to

230