Page 353 - Chayei Adam LAYOUT sivan 5782

םדא םינימ ‘ דו בלול ןיד - ח “ מק ללכ ייח

ףַנֲע" בי ִת ְּכ ִד ִמ ל"ַז ֲח ּול ְּב ִּ ק ֶ ׁש ,'ג םי ִּס ַדֲהַו ,ץ ֵע י ִר ְּּפ בי ִת ְּכ ִד ְּכ ,ד ָּח ֶא גֹור ְּת ֶא ְּו .ד ָּח ֶא בָּלּול
ּ
ּ
ּ
ןֹו ׁשְּל "ל ַחַנ יֵב ְּר ַע ְּו" בי ִת ְּכ ִד ְּכ ,תֹוב ָּרֲע 'בּו ,ד ָּח ֶא תֹבָּע ְּו ד ָּח ֶא ץ ֵע ְּו ד ָּח ֶא ףָּנָּע ,"תֹבָּע ץ ֵע
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
הֶי ְּהִּי ֶ ׁש םיִנָּ ּפ לָּּכ לַע ר ֵד ַהְּי ,ר ֵ ׁשָּּכ ס ַדֲה ֹול ןי ֵא ֶ ׁש ק ָּח ְּד ַה תַע ְּ ׁש ִב םֹוק ָּמ לָּּכ ִמּו .םי ִב ַר
ּ
ןי ִד ְּב ר ֵאָּבְּנ ֶ ׁש ֹומ ְּכ ,ר ֵ ׁשָּּכ ,םּוט ָּק ְּו ד ָּח ֶא ּו ּ ל ִפֲא ק ָּח ְּד ַה תַע ְּ ׁש ִבּו .ם ַט ְּקִנ אּ ֶ ׁש ד ָּח ֶא דַּב
ּ
ֹל
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
:ד ָּח ֶא ס ַדֲהַּב יִּגַס ְּד ר ַמֲא ַד ןא ָּמ לַע ןַני ִכ ְּמָּס ְּד ם ָּט ְּקִנ ַה ס ַדֲה
ת ַח ַא ה ָּדֻג ֲא ן ָּּת ְּ ׁשָּל ְּ ׁש תֹוֹשֲעַל ְּו הָּב ָּרֲעַו ס ַדֲהַו בָּלּול דֹג ֱאֶל ר ָּח ְּב ֻּמ ַה ן ִמ הָּו ְּצמ ִ ]ו[
ּ
ּ
ּ
ןי ִמ ְּב ם ָּדְּּג ַאְּל לֹוכָּי ְּו .הָּו ְּצ ִמ יֹונ םּו ּ ׁש ִמ ,הֶז לַע הֶז םי ִר ָּ ׁש ְּק יֵנ ְּ ׁש ּונְּי ַה ְּד רּומָּּג ר ֶ ׁש ֶק ְּב
ּ
ּ

ןָּויֵכ ְּד ם ַע ַּט ַה םי ִר ְּמֹוא ׁשֵי ְּו .יֹונְּל ה ֶשֹוע ֶ ׁש ןָּויֵּכ ,ףי ִסֹו ּת לַּב םּו ּ ׁש ִמ ןאָּּכ ןי ֵא ְּו ר ֵח ַא
ְּ
ּ
ֹוני ֵא ֶ ׁש ןָּויֵכ ְּו .ֹומ ְּצַע יֵנ ְּפ ִב ד ֵמֹוע דּוג ִא ָּה ןֵּכ ם ִא ְּו ,דֶג ֶא ךי ִרָּצ ןי ֵא ה ָּרֹו ּת ַה ן ִמ ןָּל א ָּמְּּי ַק ְּד
ּ
ְּ
ּ
ְּ
ּ
םּו ּ ׁש ִמ רֵבֹוע ֹותָּלי ִד ְּּג ך ֶר ֶד ְּב י ֵר ְּמַגְּל ר ֵח ַא ןי ִמ ל ַטָּנ ם ִא לָּבֲא( ףי ִסֹו ּת לַּב םּו ּ ׁש ִמ ןאָּּכ ןי ֵא ,ֹותָּלי ִדְּּג ך ֶר ֶד ְּכ
ְּ
ךֹות ְּב ןיִלָּע ֶה ן ִמ ּור ְּ ׁשָּנ םאו ִ ְּ 21 . )ליאוה ה"ד 'סותב ב"ל ףד הכוס .הָּו ְּצ ִּמ ַה י ֵדְּי אָּצָּּי ֶ ׁש ף ַא ֹוז ה ָּטי ִּ ׁשְּל ףי ִסֹו ּת לַּב
ּ
םדו רשב
Berura). See however Bikurei Yaakov who other hand, if it is not essential to the mitzva
disagrees. (as the Chachamim maintain), introducing
ו
another species should be a violation of
19. According to R’ Yehuda who requires adding to the mitzva. In response to this, the
one to bind his lulav, using any species other Ritva offers that while it is true that adding
than a lulav, hadasim or aravos would another species unnecessarily should pose a
constitute adding another species to the four problem, since he does so in order to beautify
which would violate the Torah prohibition of the mitzva, the addition is subservient to the
adding to mitzvos. According to the lulav and is not considered an addition.
Chachamim, however, since there is no
absolute obligation to do so, using any other 20. Chayei Adam’s note: But if he takes
species to tie them is not a violation of this a completely different species [and holds it]
(Succah 31b). On the surface, however, this the way it grows, he transgresses the
would seem counter-intuitive for if the Torah prohibition of adding, according to this
requires one to bind the species together, opinion, although he fulfilled the mitzva.
doing so is an integral part of the mitzva and Succah 31b in Tosfos.
doing so with any species should not pose a See previous note. In addressing the
problem as an addition to the mitzva. On the question as to why binding a lulav with

353