Page 293 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 293

272   PART III    Therapeutic Modalities for the Cancer Patient


         Evidence of biologic effect in the form of upregulation of HSP70   have been developed that target these pathways, with varying
         chaperone expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells   degrees of specificity. In experimental mouse models these have
                                                               shown promise in breast, colon, lung, brain tumors, and mela-
         (PBMCs) has been observed.
  VetBooks.ir  inhibitors in canine OSA, pulmonary carcinoma, and MCT cell   noma, either as monotherapy or combined with conventional
            There is in  vitro evidence of antitumor activity of HSP90
                                                                         488–492
                                                               drugs or RT.
         lines. 472–476  The HSP90 inhibitor STA-1474 has been evalu-  Recent studies suggest that polymorphisms in BRCA1
         ated in a phase I clinical trial in dogs with spontaneous cancer.   and BRCA2 may predispose certain dog breeds to mammary
         Upregulation of HSP70 after drug administration was observed   tumors 493 ; however, evidence of a similar functional deficit in
         in both tumor cells and PBMCs, and clinical responses were   DNA repair to those observed in BRCA-mutant humans, which
         observed  in dogs  with MCT,  OSA, melanoma, and  thyroid   might confer sensitivity to PARP inhibitors, is lacking, as is any
         carcinoma. 477                                        information regarding in vitro or in vivo efficacy of this class of
                                                               drug in canine or feline cancer.
         Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase and Poly
         ADP-Ribose Glycohydrolase                             Nuclear Export

         Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) is a “nick-sensor” that sig-  The transport of proteins between the nucleus and cytoplasm is a
         nals the presence of DNA damage and facilitates DNA repair. 478    tightly regulated process. Export of proteins from the nucleus to
         The first PARP enzyme was discovered by Chambon et al and   the cytoplasm is governed by a series of proteins called the expor-
         is now recognized as a superfamily of 18 members, 479  although   tins. Exportin 1 (XPO1, CRM1) is a member of this series that
         only PARP-1 and PARP-2 are known to act in DNA damage. 480    is responsible for the nuclear export of a broad variety of target
         The PARP family are also involved in the regulation of several   proteins, including a large number of known tumor suppressor
         transcription  factors,  such as  NFκB  in modulating  the  expres-  proteins, including p53, survivin, Rb, p21, and IkB. 494  XPO1 is
         sion of chemokines, adhesion molecules, inflammatory cytokines,   upregulated in many cancers versus normal tissues, and increased
         and mediators. 478  Poly ADP-ribose glycohydrolase (PARG) is the   expression can be associated with higher tumor grade and inferior
         main enzyme in catabolizing PAR to ADP-ribose. To date, only   treatment outcomes. 495–497
         one single PARG gene has been detected in mammals, encoding   Multiple small molecule inhibitors of XPO1 have been devel-
         for three RNAs, which generate three isoforms. 478    oped and evaluated preclinically. Small molecule elective inhibi-
            PARP has multiple  intracellular  functions,  including  signal-  tors of nuclear export (SINE) inactivate XPO1 and have shown
         ing DNA damage and recognizing and binding to DNA strand   considerable selective antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity
         breaks generated by DNA-damaging agents (cytotoxic drugs and   in multiple solid and hematopoietic human tumor types, 498–501
         ionizing radiation). 481  Activation of PARP is one of the earliest   and early-phase human clinical trials have been conducted
         DNA damage responses. PARP is also a modulator of DNA base   with the SINE selinexor with evidence of objective antitumor
         excision repair, which constitutes a major mechanism for genomic   activity. 502–504
         stability.  There  is  increasing  evidence  demonstrating  that  both   The SINE KPT-335 has in  vitro antiproliferative activity
         PARP and PARG repair DNA. 479  When PARP binds to DNA   in canine tumor cell lines derived from melanoma, lymphoma,
         strand breaks, it activates an enzyme causing shuttling of PARP   MCT, and OSA, and nuclear exclusion of target proteins such
         and, subsequently, opening of the chromatin. PARG enters the   as P21 and p53 after KPT-335 treatment has been demon-
         nucleus, moves to the PARP substrate, and DNA strand breaks   strated. 505,506  Oral KPT-335 was evaluated in a phase I clinical
         are repaired. Because of excessive PARG, PAR decreases and thus   trial in tumor-bearing dogs: hepatotoxicity, hyporexia, and weight
         chromatin returns to its original structure.          loss were dose limiting, and clinical responses were observed in
            PARP inhibition has been suggested as an important approach   several dogs with lymphoma. 506  KPT-335 is being developed as
         in sensitizing cancer cells to conventional cancer therapy, lead-  a veterinary cancer therapeutic, but at the time of writing it does
         ing to early clinical trials with PARP inhibitors as single agents   not have FDA approval.
         and in combination. 481–483  PARP inhibitors have been shown to
         be lethal in BRCA-deficient cells because of persistence of DNA   References
         lesions that would normally be repaired in a BRCA-dependent
         fashion, 484  suggesting that PARP inhibitors might be an effec-    1.   Argyle DJ: Gene therapy in veterinary medicine, Vet Rec 144:369–
         tive monotherapy in these cancers. Indeed, single-agent anti-  376, 1999.
         tumor activity is observed in BRCA-mutant breast and ovarian     2.   Kumar SR, Markusic DM, Biswas M, et al.: Clinical development
         cancer patients, 485–487  which has led to the FDA approval of   of gene therapy: results and lessons from recent successes, Mol Ther
         olaparib (Lynparza, AstraZeneca), rucaparib (Rubraca, Clovis   Methods Clin Dev 3:16034, 2016.
         Oncology), and niraparib (Zejula, Tesaro) for the treatment of     3.   Naldini L: Medicine: A comeback for gene therapy, Science 326:805–
         BRCA-mutant ovarian cancer; however, one might expect that   806, 2009.
         their major benefit would be to enhance conventional cytotoxic     4.   Herzog RW, Cao O, Srivastava A: Two decades of clinical gene
         drug treatment or RT, and studies have demonstrated that PARP   therapy–success is finally mounting, Discov Med 9:105–111, 2010.
         inhibition potentiates the cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs and     5.   Couzin-Frankel J: Breakthrough of the year 2013. Cancer immu-
                                                                    notherapy, Science 342:1432–1433, 2013.
         ionizing radiation through inhibition of DNA repair in cancer     6.   Bartosch  B,  Cosset  FL:  Strategies  for  retargeted  gene  deliv-
         cells.                                                     ery  using vectors derived from lentiviruses,  Curr  Gene Ther 4:
            Inhibition of PARG could also be one of the pathways selected   427–443, 2004.
         for cancer management because of its effects on increased sensitiv-    7.   Tomanin R, Scarpa M: Why do we need new gene therapy viral
         ity to both radiation and chemotherapy. Although PARG inhibi-  vectors? Characteristics, limitations and future perspectives of viral
         tors have lagged behind PARP inhibitors, a number of molecules   vector transduction, Curr Gene Ther 4:357–372, 2004.
   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298