Page 651 - Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine
P. 651

57  Rectoanal Diseases – Medical and Surgical Management  619

                 The clinical signs accompanying rectal tumors are   Surgical Management
  VetBooks.ir  similar to most other rectal diseases, featuring histories   In preparation for surgery of the rectum, many surgeons
               of straining to defecate and occasionally the presence of
                                                                  recommend feeding a low‐residue diet for 4–5 days
               narrow “ribbon‐like” stool due to partial restriction of
               the rectal lumen. Hematochezia is variably present,     preoperatively and avoiding enemas in the three days
                                                                  preceding surgery. Perioperative antibiotic cover typi-
               depending on the involvement of the mucosa. Tumors   cally consists of cephalosporins but some surgeons
               such as adenocarcinoma and mucosal lymphoma often     prefer  metronidazole or other agents that may target
               present with  histories of  hematochezia, while  tumors   colorectal anaerobic bacteria. The need for postopera-
               affecting the muscularis and deeper mural layers, such as   tive antibiotics depends on degree of contamination
               leiomyoma or GI stromal tumors, usually do not feature     during  surgery,  but  is  typically  not  necessary  beyond
               hematochezia.
                                                                  24 hours postoperatively.
                                                                    Rectal surgery can be divided into two general catego-
                                                                  ries: procedures that can be performed from a perineal
               Pathophysiology
                                                                  or transanal approach and procedures that require an
               Rectal tumors result from neoplastic or hyperplastic   intraabdominal approach. The first is the simpler and
               changes in normal tissue of the rectum or anal sphinc-  more commonly performed option. The exact distance
               ter. Any of the various tissue types within the rectum   accessible depends on the patient’s size and should be
               can be involved (mucosa, secretory epithelia, smooth   assessed via digital rectal exam prior to deciding upon
               muscle, lymphoid  tissue, etc.), but tumors affecting   the approach. Transanal rectal eversion (i.e., prolapse;
               other than the epithelia (such as leiomyoma or GIST   also called “rectal pull‐out” procedure; Figure 57.6) using
               tumors) are uncommon. Of all the potential rectal   stay sutures allows access to tumors of the distal rectum.
               tumor types,  adenocarcinoma (possibly resulting from   If not circumferential in nature, such tumors may be
               malignant transformation of rectal polyps) is the most   removed by scalpel blade and hand‐sewing, or by use of
               common.                                            a thoracoabdominal stapling device. For circumferential
                                                                  lesions, a transanal rectal pull‐through resection and
                                                                  anastomosis may be performed.
               Diagnosis and Medical Management                     The author prefers to transect and suture the circum-
                                                                  ference of the rectum in thirds, preventing the orad seg-
               Direct digital rectal examination will often reveal the   ment from retracting too far cranially. A grossly normal
               presence of intrarectal masses, and may allow some   tissue margin of 0.5–1.0 cm is typically feasible with
               determination of mucosal vs deeper mural location.   either transanal rectal eversion or transanal rectal pull‐
               Accessibility of mass lesions will depend upon the depth   through. If larger margins are required based on preop-
               of the lesion within the rectum, the size of the animal and   erative diagnostics, a more aggressive surgical approach
               examiner’s reach. Effective digital rectal examination   is required, as described below.
               often requires sedation of the patient, particularly with
               smaller animals.
                 Routine diagnostic imaging, such as abdominal radi-
               ography, has a low yield in the assessment of rectal
               tumors. Abdominal ultrasound examination can also fail
               to fully appreciate the size and location of rectal tumors
               within the pelvic canal. In patients where rectal malig-
               nancies are suspected, a combination of colonoscopy
               (allowing biopsy and assessment of the adjacent mucosa)
               and abdominal/pelvic CT examination (for staging,
               assessment of bone involvement and invasion into other
               pelvic organs such as the urethra or prostate) is generally
               recommended.
                 Medical management of nonpolypoid masses in the
               rectum is generally fruitless. Dietary change to “low‐resi-
               due”  diets  and  use  of  laxatives  such  as  lactulose  will
               improve clinical signs in some patients and can allow a
               degree of conservative management, but most patients   Figure 57.6  Early intraoperative view of a rectal pull‐through
               will require surgical management for the best long‐term   procedure to remove a large, benign rectal polyp (2 cm diameter)
               treatment effect and prognosis.                    in a Labrador retriever.
   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656