Page 653 - Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine
P. 653

621


  VetBooks.ir






               58

               Dysbiosis and the Use of Pre‐, Pro‐ and Synbiotics

               Jan S. Suchodolski, MedVet, Dr Med Vet, PhD, AGAF, DACVM

               College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA


                 The Importance of the                            studies in humans and animals have associated intestinal
               Gastrointestinal Microbiota                        dysbiosis, defined as alterations in intestinal microbiota
                                                                  composition and/or richness, with various disorders
               The intestinal microbiota is the collection of all live   such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), granuloma-
               microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses)   tous colitis, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and allergies. For
               that inhabit the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The word   these reasons, the normalization of dysbiosis appears to
               microflora is often used in older textbooks, but microbi-  be a prudent therapeutic goal.
               ota (from bios, Greek: life) is the technically correct term.
                 The total microbial load in the intestine is estimated to
                                           14
                                  12
               represent between 10  and 10  organisms, which is     The Gastrointestinal Microbiota
               about 10 times the number of cells composing the host   in Healthy Dogs and Cats
               body. Because the majority of intestinal bacteria cannot
               be cultured using commonly used plating techniques,   We are just beginning to understand the complexity of
               molecular tools (mostly targeting the 16S rRNA gene) are   the microbiota and are only at a very early stage in our
               now the standard for identification of microbiota, and   abilities to properly assess the entire microbiota and its
               have improved our understanding of the complex micro-  functions. The microbiota varies along the GI tract, and
               bial  diversity  in  the  intestine.  It  is  estimated  that  the   there are also clear differences between the mucosa‐
               intestine harbors several hundred bacterial phylotypes.   associated and luminal microbiota. Additionally, we are
               The microbiota differs substantially on the species and   not yet able to fully assess the interactions between the
               strain level in each individual animal yet despite these dif-  microbiota and the host immune system. Several recent
               ferences, the metabolic end‐products in the intestine are   studies have described which bacterial groups reside in
               similar between individuals. This new insight into the   the GI tract of dogs and cats, and some initial work has
               complexity and individuality of the gastrointestinal   been done to understand the metabolic interactions
               microbiota has increased research efforts to better under-  between microbiota and host.
               stand the importance of a balanced microbial ecosystem   Studies using traditional bacterial culture estimated
               for regulation of host immunity in health and disease.  that the bacterial load in the small intestine of healthy
                                                                                     5
                                                                                 2
                 The interactions between intestinal bacteria and the   dogs is typically 10 –10  cfu/g of small intestinal content,
                                                                                        9
               host immune system are mediated through various    but can reach as high as 10 cfu/g. In the colon, the num-
               mechanisms, either via direct contact between bacteria   ber of cultivable bacteria is much higher, with up to
                                                                    11
               and the innate immune system (e.g., via Toll‐like recep-  10  cfu/g. Molecular studies using high‐throughput
               tors,  NOD2  receptors),  or  through  microbial‐derived   sequencing are now the standard for microbiota charac-
               metabolites. These metabolites can be either directly   terization and have identified many novel and important
               produced by bacteria (e.g., vitamins, short‐chain fatty   bacterial genera that were previously not appreciated in
               acids [SCFA]), or may be primary host metabolites that   the canine and feline GI tract.
               are converted through bacterial enzymes into secondary   The predominant phyla in the feces of healthy dogs
               metabolites (e.g., conversion of primary to secondary   are  Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and
               bile acids, tryptophan into indole). Consequently, many   Proteobacteria. Lower abundance phyla (less than 1% of


               Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine Volume I, First Edition. Edited by David S. Bruyette.
               © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2020 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
               Companion website: www.wiley.com/go/bruyette/clinical
   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658