Page 654 - Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine
P. 654

622  Section 6  Gastrointestinal Disease

            the micriobiota) include Spirochaetes, Tenericutes, and   changes in bacterial groups, and/or changes in the func-
  VetBooks.ir  Verrucomicrobia. The Firmicutes can be divided into   tional and immunomodulatory properties of the gastro-
                                                              intestinal microbiota. All these forms overlap to some
            several subgroups on a family and genus level. It com-
            prises many phylogenetically distinct bacterial groups.
                                                                There are several physiologic mechanisms that regu-
            These groups (e.g., Ruminococcus spp., Faecalibacterium   extent.
            spp.,  Dorea), together with Bacteroidetes and    late microbial colonization in the GI tract. Gastric acid,
            Actinobacteria (i.e.,  Bifidobacterium) are producers of   bile, and pancreatic enzymes all have antibacterial roles
            metabolites that have direct impacts on host health. For   and eliminate a proportion of ingested organisms.
            example,  bacteria  can  utilize  complex  carbohydrates   Intestinal motility is an important regulator of bacterial
            (e.g., starch, cellulose, pectin, and inulin) as nutrient   adhesion to the mucosa in the small intestine. Microbes
            sources,  and their  fermentation produces  SCFA (e.g.,   that are unable to adhere to the epithelium will be pushed
            acetate, propionate, and butyrate). These act as energy   to the large intestine, which has a more stagnant motility
            sources for the host, regulate intestinal motility, and are   and therefore higher bacterial numbers. The ileocolic
            important growth factors for epithelial cells. SCFA are   valve is a natural barrier that prevents retrograde migra-
            also  important antiinflammatory  molecules,  as  they   tion of bacteria from the large to the small intestine.
            induce immunoregulatory T cells (T reg ). Other bacteria‐  Any changes in these mechanisms may lead to dysbio-
            derived  metabolites,  such  as  indoles  (a  byproduct  of   sis, but whether this leads to disease will depend on the
            tryptophan degradation) or secondary bile acids, are also   susceptibility of the individual, as not every animal
            antiinflammatory, thereby maintaining immune homeo-  exposed  to  these  risk  factors  will  develop  disease.  For
            stasis and strengthening intestinal barrier function.  example, acid suppression therapy increases gastric and
             The microbiota primes the immune system, aids in the   duodenal bacterial counts in humans, but not all patients
            defense against potential intestinal pathogens, and   show clinical signs. Similarly, dogs with experimentally
              provides nutritional benefits to the host. Bacteria com-  induced exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) have
            municate with the host’s innate immune system through   increased bacterial numbers in the proximal small intes-
            cell‐associated receptors such as Toll‐like receptors   tine. Rapid diet changes, dietary indiscretion, changes in
            (TLR) and dendritic cells. The resident intestinal micro-  the architecture of the intestine, or changes in intestinal
            biota is also a crucial part of the intestinal barrier, due to   motility (i.e., surgical creation of intestinal loops, short
            the  phenomenon  of  “colonization  resistance”  which   bowel syndrome, and resection of the ileocolic valve) are
              protects the host from invading pathogens through com-  also associated with dysbiosis. The development of dys-
            petition for oxygen, nutrients, and adhesion sites on the   biosis may then lead to changes in gastrointestinal physi-
            mucosa.                                           ology that will negatively impact function of the GI tract.
                                                              Examples are an altered intestinal barrier with increased
                                                              intestinal permeability and direct damage to the intesti-
              The Gastrointestinal Microbiota                 nal brush border and enterocytes leading to nutrient and
            in Disease                                        vitamin malabsorption. An overgrowth in specific bacte-
                                                              rial groups may lead to increased competition for nutri-
            There is clear evidence that altered microbial communi-  ents and vitamins and to increased deconjugation of bile
            ties play a role in the pathophysiology of various  disorders.   acids, resulting in the creation of potentially deleterious
            Chronic dysbiosis is likely an important environmental   metabolites.
            risk factor for development of several chronic diseases in   The intestinal microbiota also plays a role in the patho-
            genetically susceptible individuals. For example, recent   genesis of IBD. Intestinal inflammation leads to a shift
            epidemiologic studies in humans have linked antibiotic   towards gram‐negative bacteria (i.e., Proteobacteria)
            administration in early childhood with an increased risk   that may perpetuate the disease. Existing dysbiosis may
            for development of allergies and obesity. Also, antibiotic‐  trigger alterations in the immune system, which in turn
            induced reductions in gut microbiota diversity were a   diminish the colonization resistance of the resident
            risk factor for higher mortality outcomes in allogeneic   microbiota. Several studies in dogs and cats have
            hematopoietic  stem  cell  transplantation.  These  initial   reported increases in Enterobacteriaceae in the GI tract
            data in humans suggest that dysbiosis is clinically rele-  of dogs and cats, and these are associated with inflam-
            vant and the correction of dysbiosis would appear to be a   mation and altered mucosal architecture. In contrast, a
            prudent therapeutic goal. However, at this time, there are   reduction in some major bacterial groups (i.e.,
            still only limited clinical data available to guide specific   Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae,  Faecalibacterium
            treatments for correction of dysbiosis in dogs and cats.  prausnitzii and Clostridium coccoides subgroups) occurs
             Dysbiosis  occurs  in various  forms; it  may  be due  to   in GI disease, suggesting a loss of normal and protective
            overgrowth of specific pathogens, or due to more general   microbiota in GI disease (Figure 58.1).
   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659