Page 320 - The Welfare of Cattle
P. 320

daIrY CoW WeLfare and herd turnoVer rates                                   297


                            40
                            30
                            20                                     P Removed
                            10                                     P Died
                             0                                     H Removed
                               100–200  201–500  501–1500  1501–3000  >3000  H Died




            Figure 25.9   Percentage removal and died in Pinedo et al. (P) and hadley et al. (h) by size of herd.
                                           12
                            11
            (Source: Pinedo et al.  and hadley et al. )
                                      reaSONS FOr reMOVaLS

               Pinedo’s study reported an annualized live-removal rate 25.1% and an annualized on-farm death
            rate of 6.6%. Hadley’s study reported an annualized live-removal rate of 28.5% and an annualized
            on-farm death rate of 4.4%. The table below reports the reasons for removal using frequency rates.
            Frequency rates are useful in identifying the relative risk of removal by reason but do not include
            the number of animals affected. As an example, a herd of 1,000 cows with one cow each exiting the
            herd in the time period under consideration and because of: low production; delayed reproduction;
            injury; mastitis; and death would report a frequency distribution of 20% for each of those five rea-
            sons to sum to 100%. It would not tell you the total number of animals removed from the herd was
            very small (total removal rate is 5/1000 = 0.5% in this example). Pinedo’s cattle were at a 20.6% risk
            of on-farm death in comparison to the other risks reported for those cattle, but the actual percent of
            those dying of all cows counted was 6.6%. Similarly, Hadley’s cattle were at a 13.9% risk of on-farm
            death in comparison to the other risks of those cattle, but had a 4.4% on-farm death rate for all cows
            counted (Table 25.3).
               The Pinedo’s study used records from DHIA services that provide producers the option to select
            from up to eight reasons for removals. Surprisingly 43% of the herds only selected one or two
            reasons. Those herds reported much higher death rates than herds using three or more reasons
            demonstrating how a recording system may misrepresent the reporting of live removal or on-farm
            death rates.

            table 25.3  Frequency Distribution of Cows removed from herd according to Dairy herd Improvement
                     (DhI) Codes
                                                 Pinedo et al.                   hadley et al.
            reason                                   %                               %
            Low production                           12.1                            12.8
            died                                     20.6                            13.9
            reproduction                             17.7                            20.5
            Injury/other                             14.3                            29.1
            Mastitis                                 12.1                            13.1
            feet and legs                            8.1                              4.8
            disease                                  6.9                              3.2
            udder                                    3.2                              3.9
            reason not reported                      5.0                              –
            sum                                     100                             100
            Source: Pinedo, deVries and Webb  and hadley, Wolf and harsh. 12
                                     11
   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325