Page 385 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 385

with goals” (p. 51); as such, conflict and emotion is closely linked to strong negative and positive

               responses. With civic dialogue pertaining to the sensitive subject area of race, incidents of conflict


               and disagreement was an inevitable occurrence. But given the issue was on biases and the group

               was racially diverse, race conflict was likely latent and could be activated any time (Essed, 1991).



                       Unlike business and office environments, civic dialogue group interactions are predisposed

               to  a range of personalities,  communication styles  and interaction norms. Additionally, ethnic,


               cultural and gendered styles of communication among dialogue attendees may result in a mix of

               expressions and interactions that require explanation and decoding by the moderator or other group


               participants. The dialogue group facilitators played a key role in helping the participants stay with

               issues  long  enough  to  flesh  out  the  surface  and  underlying  issues.  During  discussion  about

               unemployment  among  African  American  youth,  the  facilitator  helped  to  hold  the  space  for


               dialogue attendees to continue the discussion, even as some participants wanted to move on and


               discuss other topics of concern. In another instance, a facilitator was intentional about re-visiting

               a tension-producing period from the previous dialogue session. The sensitivity and courage of the

               facilitator to put an issue that resulted in strong emotions and disagreement back on the table,


               rather than “let sleeping dogs lie,” allowed the attendees to dialogue about lingering thoughts and

               reflections. Facilitators at Community Conversations reported that taking a second look at the tense


               issue allowed them (the facilitator) and the attendees to stand up to the tension in a way that was

               healthy and respectful of the need revisit the disagreement and tension as a way to move past it.



                       “Hurt  stories,” refers to  the effect  of the stories conveyed on the storyteller and some

               listeners. The “hurt stories” revealed around the dialogue circle reflected enduring and unresolved


               pain that some participants had lived with for years. Hurt feelings depict an emotional response,

               as described by Folger et al. (2013) an emotional response to conflict that may result in physical


                                                             366
   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390