Page 390 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 390

occurred, it is unknown if incidents of transformation resulted from these sessions. The question

               of whether transformation among dialogue participants occurred is a subject for future study.



                       Sustaining the conversation, bridging the divide describes the effort involved in the process

               of preparing participants to dialogue about social issues they care enough about to engage in such


               as race and discrimination. One variable underlying civic dialogue focused on difficult topics is

               the ability to have multiple opportunities for that discussion to be thoroughly explored. Regardless


               of  the  composition  of  the  dialogue  group,  (friends,  associates,  or  strangers)  the  historical

               significance  and  gravity  of  racism  in  the  United  States  necessitates  successive  and  ongoing


               opportunities to participate in dialogue conversation and begin a journey to bridging a racial divide

               that is deeply rooted in American cultures and communities. With this in mind, it is important to

               remind the reader that the composition of the dialogues in Albany had ‘Implicit Bias’ as its initial


               meeting theme evolving to race with a majority of African Americans and women in attendance.


                       Much scholarly work on the benefits of sustained civic and deliberative dialogue exists.


               Saunders (2001, 2005, 2011), who has conducted extensive research on the topic of sustained

               dialogue,  defined  and  developed  a  model  for  effective  applications  that  calls  for  a  focus  on


               relationships, relational rebuilding, and on-going continuous engagement of dialogue attendees

               (Saunders, 2011). Although the dialogues on implicit bias was coordinated by an elected city


               official and convened in a mid-sized city, Albany is the capital of New York state and as such

               almost functioned as an independent initiative as these events were not  designed or based on


               Saunders sustained dialogue model or with any true model that I could observe.  Several elements

               of the framework I can say were good for analysis as they were instructive when examining the


               third theoretical proposition derived from examining tension and conflict in dialogues especially

               when they are convened to examine race and racism. The participants seemed to want more CCs.


                                                             371
   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395