Page 386 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 386

manifestations such as tears, tense posture, or quiet behaviors or challenge. The makeup of the

               dialogue groups is important to understanding the role of emotion and how emotional displays


               were handled within the context of “heart stories and hurt stories” as they unfolded and were

               exhibited during the discourse and exchange among members of the group. It is important to note


               here, as detailed in Chapter IV, the general composition of the groups that gathered to participate

               in the dialogues on race were composed mostly of African American women. In addition to these


               women, African American men and White women and men comprised the groups. Women in the

               dialogue groups who displayed emotional responses, including raised tone of voice, expressions


               of sadness and exasperation, and physical expressions, such as tightly folded arms and looks of

               outrage may have felt more comfortable displaying these responses based on the composition of


               the participants combined with and a process that emphasized safety, security and voice.


                       In one instance, a hurt story relayed by a grandmother told of the lack of an appropriate


               response by school administrators to ongoing racial threats and harassment experienced by her

               granddaughter. The story was met with a reply from a White male participant who prefaced his

               comments as useful insight about how to deal with the unresponsive school administrators. The


               White male instructed the grandmother and others in the dialogue group (using the following

               paraphrased language): “you all should not be so angry with your demands, instead you should kill


               them [school administrators] with kindness.” Responses to his comment included outbursts of

               emotion from participants around the dialogue circle and physical displays of surprise and disbelief


               about  a response that, in  their understanding  clearly lacked empathy.  It seems  that the White

               participant felt empowered enough in his position, with respect to other race dialogue participants

               (Locher, 2004) to make such a statement. Locher (2004) informed, “Power can be exercised with


               good  intentions  or  bad  intentions  or  without  conscious  intention  at  all”  (p.  10).  Further,  his



                                                             367
   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391