Page 393 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 393

a result of the dialogues he came to some knowledge or some new understanding about

                       how discrimination may impact the differences in ethnicity. So for me that was a significant


                       moment because when he came in he seemed very set in his ways about his belief system.

                       It was interesting that he made the slightest bit of change just from being engaged and


                       listening to the conversation.” (F02FW)


                       The  value  of  reflection  within  the  context  of  sustained  dialogue  is  that  it  creates


               opportunities for people to think through the interactions that occurred and keep chipping away at

               past tensions, conflicts, and disagreements that keep people divided. In two instances during the


               dialogues  on  race,  the  act  of  sustaining  the  conversation  occurred  with  the  help  of  skilled

               facilitators. Attempts to sustain the dialogue to address and come to some resolve or clarity around

               tension  producing  comments  helped  dialogue  group  members  (participants  and  facilitators)


               acknowledge the cause of disagreement and tension among group members. Doing so introduced


               an element of transparency about the tension in an explicit way. The act of standing up to tension

               assisted the group in the process of “working through” (Yankelovich, 2001, p. 182) and in further

               self-questioning of and reflection on cherished assumptions.



                       The  first  instance  of  sustained  dialogue  occurred  after  an  older  White  man  had  made

               multiple references to the superiority of bi-racial children (referred to as hybrids) during the second


               dialogue series. Rather than ignoring the tension caused by the comments, the facilitator wisely

               asked the man to explain his comments and asked other dialogue attendees to examine how they


               felt about his reference to bi-racial children as hybrids, as well as his comments.


                       A second instance of sustained dialogue occurred when a White male participant made

               dismissive comments pertaining to  alleged improper treatment  by school  administrators about


               racial harassment of a school-aged child. In this case, the facilitator processed the tensions and

                                                             374
   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398