Page 392 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 392
of reflection by dialogue participants and others and how it assists in the process changing
perspectives and opinions; however, Saunders (2001) and Wheatley (2007) provide useful insights.
The act of reflection facilitates bridging the divide between civic and deliberative dialogue
participants as they “gradually give up their misconceptions in a psychological space they create
for themselves” (Saunders, 2001, p. 145). Reflection is a function of listening to one’s own inner-
voice or to others and an opportunity to consider new information while challenging personal
beliefs. Listening requires being present and contributes to bridging the divide between old and
new perceptions and ways of thinking. As the act of reflection about the stories heard during the
dialogue occurs, it aids in producing clarity and the courage to change (Wheatley, 2007).
A shift in perspective resulting from personal reflection can lead to a change in beliefs or
personal perspectives. As previously mentioned, one participant (P16MW) reflected on a shift after
a period of reflection indicating that he thought racism was a thing of the past. Although the
dialogues on implicit bias had helped to recognize that racism still occurs, he prefaced his comment
with not knowing both sides of the example he referenced. This indicates that there is still doubt,
however, he was willing to reconsider his previous belief system that led him to believe that racism
was also in the past. A second indication of a shift in perception was observed by a facilitator who
was paired with a White senior from the community center who had been in attendance at the first
Community Conversation. The facilitator indicated that she observed a shift after he participated
in the dialogue, which included the video segment from Race: The power of an illusion, dyad
conversation, and participation in the large group dialogue session. After helping the senior
complete a post survey to collect his thoughts and opinions at the end of the evening, she indicated:
“He actually changed one of the answers after being in the dialogue. It was the question
that I think talked specifically about inequalities specifically related to race. And I think as
373