Page 27 - Final Report - KAUSC Team
P. 27
KAUSC Team
1.6 Recommended Option
This section compares the key characteristics of each solution option and recommends a
preferred solution option for implementation.
1.6.1 Option Rankings
In this section, after coming up with three options that are according to the regulations. The
team needed to decide which of the available options are the most suitable to the team. The
KTDA table gives the difference between each option to choose the highest scored one.
Table 19 KTDA for comparison of options
Musts Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
Dimensions GO GO GO
Wheels and tyres GO GO GO
GO GO GO
Doors GO GO GO
luggage
Steering system GO GO GO
GO GO GO
Lighting GO GO GO
Driver's compartment
Weight GO GO GO
Safe Design GO GO GO
Wants Wight Score W x S Score W x S Score W x S
Light weight 25 7 175 9 225 5 125
Cost 30 9 270 8 240 7 210
30
Ease of 15 7 210 6 180 3 90
manufacturing
4 60 3 45 7 105
Performance
Total 715 690 530
26 | P a g e
