Page 101 - Deep Learning
P. 101

84                          Creativity

               Unfortunately, this interesting and elegant theory – so 21st century in
            both  its  emphasis  on  self-organization  and  its  attempt  to  explain  cogni-
            tive  phenomena  with  neurophysiology –  cannot be  true. The behavior of
            individuals vis-à-vis complex cognitive tasks is strongly influenced by prior
            knowledge and practice. training effects are large in magnitude and they
            can make the production of a novel solution either more or less likely. The
            Gestalt theory cannot accommodate this commonplace observation. What
            is the locus of training effects if restructuring is a predetermined tumble
            down a minimal energy curve to a stable end state specified by the laws of
            self-organization, operating on the electrical activity of neural matter? The
            Gestalters formulated their theory in conscious opposition to the behaviorist
            claim that human beings are infinitely malleable in response to experience.
            as a consequence, they produced a theory that goes too far in its denial
            of prior experience, as Jean Piaget, robert Weisberg and other critics have
            pointed out.  60
               Köhler’s hypothesized connection between self-organization in the cor-
            tex and creative thinking is not explanatory but itself in need of explanation.
            Why must a structure that is determined by the laws of self-organization in
            neural matter correspond precisely to the mental representation of a situ-
            ation that is most helpful in solving the problem that the situation poses?
            Without further principles about the relation between the brain, the mind
            and the world, this intrinsic harmony appears as mysterious as Poincaré’s
            claim about the relation between beauty and mathematical truth. indeed,
            the claim that the direction of a creative process is dictated by the laws of
            material nature is strangely incompatible with the open-ended character of
            creative work.
               The Gestalt theory of restructuring has no deep answer to the question
            of why creativity is limited. Why do we not flip instantaneously and effort-
            lessly, as soon as we encounter a poor Gestalt? Why does the flipping act
            require cognitive work, even sustained effort in the face of an impasse? The
            Gestalters sometimes wrote as if there is resistance to representational change.
            For example, Koffka wrote, “We know from the testimony of great thinkers
            that in order to solve difficult problems, they persevered in concentrating
            on them. But this concentration is effective only inasmuch as it supplies the
            problematical external situation with sufficient energy to make reorganiza-
            tion  possible.”   However,  they  never  specified  why  restructuring  requires
                        61
            “sufficient energy.”
               a satisfactory explanation for creativity should break down the creative
            process  into  component  processes  that  are  simpler  than  the  target  process
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106