Page 342 - Ranah Studi Agraria: Penguasaan Tanah dan Hubungan Agraris
P. 342

Landownership Tenancy, and ...

               cropping is most intensive and yields high compared with other
               villages. The one exception is upland Village VI (Gunungwangi)
               where over 50 percent of even the larger owners (0.5 ha and
               above) are involved in farm labor, many of them temporarily

               migrating at harvest and cultivation time to nearby villages.
               Partly because of the diversified agricultural base in the up-
               land villages, we find very few households involve in pure farm
               laboring or pure non agricultural activities, quite a high pro-
               portion even of landless households combining these pursuits
               with agriculture.
                   With respect of major sources of family income (Appen-
               dix-Table 6.17.), farm laboring is only important among land-
               less in the lowland (though also of some significance in Village
               VI mentioned above). Village III (Gemarang) stands out once
               again with over fifty percent of landless households depend-
               ing on farm laboring as a major income source. Farming is of
               overwhelming significance among all sawah owning groups,
               the one major exception being Village VII (Malausma) in which
               quite a high proportion of even the larger farmers obtained
               most of their family income from trade in Semarang, many of
               these families presumably involved in land leasing arrange-
               ments. Mention might also be made of white collar work in

               Sukaambit (Village V) conducted by around 15–20 percent of
               households in all land owning classes (even the landless), and
               probably a major explanation for the predominance of ten-
               ancy contracts in this village as note in Section C.
                   In general, looking at the data by village, there is no doubt
               that some of the marked lowland-upland contrasts noted in
               the baseline studies continue prevail. Nevertheless, one is

                                                                  273
   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347