Page 577 - Microeconomics, Fourth Edition
P. 577

c13marketstructureandcompetition.qxd  7/30/10  10:44 AM  Page 551







                                 13.4 OLIGOPOLY WITH HORIZONTALLY DIFFERENTIATED PRODUCTS                       551

                      differentiated. 25  If the store-brand price were less than half the price of Duracell, all
                      consumers would choose the store brand. By contrast, although few people could
                      make a compelling case that Diet Coke has an unambiguously higher quality than
                      Diet Pepsi, some consumers have loyalties toward one brand over the other, and thus
                      do not regard the products as perfect substitutes. These brands are horizontally dif-
                      ferentiated but not vertically differentiated.
                         Horizontal differentiation is an important concept for the theory of oligopoly and
                      monopolistic competition that we study in this chapter. Firms selling horizontally dif-
                      ferentiated products have downward-sloping demand curves, as Figure 13.9 shows.
                         In Figure 13.9(a), where horizontal differentiation is weak, the firm’s demand is
                      quite sensitive to a change in its own price and the prices of its rivals. A relatively small
                      increase in the firm’s own price (from $30 to $35) results in a relatively large decrease
                      in quantity (from 40 to 20 units), and a small decrease in the price charged by a com-
                      petitor also results in a large decrease in the quantity sold by the firm, illustrated by
                      the large leftward shift in the demand curve from D to D .
                         In Figure 13.9(b), where horizontal differentiation is strong, the firm’s demand is
                      much less sensitive to a change in its own price and the prices of its rivals. A small
                      increase in the firm’s own price (from $30 to $35) results in only a small decrease in
                      quantity (from 40 to 38 units), and a small decrease in the price charged by a competi-
                      tor also results in only a small decrease in the quantity sold by the firm, illustrated by
                      the small leftward shift in the demand curve from D to D .



                                                                                      D"  D

                                  Price (dollars per unit)  $35   D     Price (dollars per unit)  $35




                                                                         $30
                                   $30
                                                                  D'

                                               20          40                                   38 40
                                             Quantity (units per month)           Quantity (units per month)
                                 (a) Weak horizontal differentiation   (b) Strong horizontal differentiation

                       FIGURE 13.9    Horizontal Differentiation and the Firm’s Demand Curve
                       In panel (a), horizontal differentiation is weak. The firm’s demand curve D is downward slop-
                       ing, but the quantity demanded is sensitive to changes in the firm’s price. A given increase in
                       price, say from $30 per unit to $35 per unit, holding competitors’ prices fixed, leads to a large
                       reduction in the quantity demanded. Moreover, when competitors reduce their prices, the
                       firm’s demand curve shifts leftward, from D to D , by a large amount. By contrast, in panel (b),
                       horizontal differentiation is stronger. The firm’s demand is not as sensitive to a change in its
                       own price, and when competitors cut their prices, the firm’s demand curve shifts leftward, from
                       D to D , by a relatively smaller amount.


                      25 In the language of Chapters 4 and 5, consumer indifference curves for Duracell batteries and store-brand
                      batteries would be linear. In reality, consumers might not equate two store-brand batteries with one Duracell
                      battery because of the convenience factor. A battery that lasts longer takes up less space than two batteries
                      and does not have to be changed as often. For simplicity, here we ignore the convenience factor.
   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582