Page 696 - Microeconomics, Fourth Edition
P. 696

c16GeneralEquilibriumTheory.qxd  8/16/10  9:13 PM  Page 670







                  670                   CHAPTER 16   GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM THEORY
                  economically efficient  that an allocation of goods and inputs is economically efficient if there is no other
                  (Pareto efficient) Char-  feasible allocation of goods and inputs that would make some consumers better off
                  acteristic of an allocation of  without hurting other consumers (some books refer to this as Pareto efficient). By con-
                  goods and inputs in an  trast, an allocation of goods and inputs is economically inefficient (or Pareto ineffi-
                  economy if there is no other  cient) if there is an alternative feasible allocation of goods and inputs that would make
                  feasible allocation of goods
                  and inputs that would make  all consumers better off than the initial allocation does. Put another way, for any in-
                  some consumers better off  efficient allocation we can always find at least one efficient allocation that consumers
                  without hurting other   would unanimously prefer to the inefficient one. At an inefficient allocation of goods
                  consumers.            and inputs, the economy is not getting all that it can get from its resources.
                                           Given this definition of efficiency, a competitive equilibrium such as the one
                  economically inefficient
                  (Pareto inefficient) Char-  shown in Figure 16.9 needs to satisfy three conditions if it is to be efficient:
                  acteristic of an allocation of
                  goods and inputs if there is  1. Given the total amounts of energy and food (goods) that are consumed by the two
                  an alternative feasible alloca-  types of households, white collar and blue collar, there is no way that we can real-
                  tion of goods and inputs that  locate these amounts among the households to make all households better off
                  would make all consumers  than they are at the competitive equilibrium. That is, the allocation of goods must
                  better off as compared with  satisfy the condition of exchange efficiency. Generally, we have efficiency in ex-
                  the initial allocation.  change when a fixed stock of consumption goods cannot be reallocated among

                  exchange efficiency A    consumers in an economy without making at least some consumers worse off. We
                  characteristic of resource   have inefficiency in exchange when we can reallocate a fixed basket of consump-
                  allocation in which a fixed  tion goods among consumers in a way that makes all consumers better off.
                  stock of consumption goods  2. Given the total amounts of capital and labor (inputs) that are used by the two
                  cannot be reallocated among
                  consumers in an economy  types of firms, energy producers and food producers, there is no way that we
                  without making at least  can reallocate these amounts among the firms so that they produce more energy
                  some consumers worse off.  and more food than they do when they are at the competitive equilibrium. That
                                           is, the allocation of inputs must satisfy the condition of input efficiency. Generally,
                  input efficiency A       we have input efficiency when a fixed stock of inputs cannot be reallocated among
                  characteristic of resource
                  allocation in which a fixed  firms in an economy without reducing the output of at least one of the goods
                  stock of inputs cannot be  that is produced in the economy. In other words, we have input efficiency when
                  reallocated among firms in  an expansion of output in one industry (e.g., food) necessitates a reduction in
                  an economy without reduc-  output in another industry (e.g., energy). We have input inefficiency when we
                  ing the output of at least  can reallocate a fixed stock of inputs among firms in a way that simultaneously
                  one of the goods that is  expands the output of all of the goods produced in the economy.
                  produced in the economy.
                                        3. Given the total amounts of capital and labor that are available in the economy,
                                           there is no way that we can make all consumers better off by producing more of
                                           one product (e.g., energy) and less of the other (e.g., food). That is, the allocation
                  substitution efficiency  of goods and inputs in the economy must satisfy the condition of substitution
                  A characteristic of resource  efficiency. By contrast, an allocation of goods and inputs is substitution inefficient
                  allocation in which, given  if we can make all consumers better off by producing more of one product and
                  the total amounts of capital  less of another.
                  and labor that are available
                  in the economy, there is no  In the next three sections, we explore each of these notions of efficiency in greater
                  way to make all consumers
                  better off by producing  detail and show that the general competitive equilibrium in Figure 16.9 satisfies all
                  more of one product and  three efficiency conditions.
                  less of another.
                                        EXCHANGE EFFICIENCY
                                        To see whether the competitive equilibrium satisfies the condition of exchange
                                        efficiency, we will need to develop a graphical tool called the Edgeworth box, used
                                        to describe exchange efficiency and inefficiency.
   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701