Page 28 - Forensic News Journal Jan Feb 2018
P. 28

Psychological Autopsies

        investigation. As humans,  from the ongoing inves-                        wake, conversations are

        it is natural to want all            tigation and expanding               typically centered around
        questions answered, not              the lines of questioning             the decedent.  Although
        just for curiosity but also          is reasonable. However,              questioning the imme-

        for purposes of healing.             interviewing is an art;              diate family is not the
        So, why do people re-                therefore, purely objec-             norm, sharing of stories

        act differently, even with           tive interview protocols             and reminiscing are com-
        similar profiles? Human              do not exist.  Interviews            monplace. What I have
        behavior is unique; we               should be conversational             noticed during conversa-

        each have different trig-            in manner, which is a give  tions are responses, which
        gers, along with different           and take relationship be-            incorporate the decedent’s

        levels of tolerance and              tween the interviewer and  last perspectives, and how
        reasoning capabilities. No  interviewee.   Each party’s  they either had changed or
        one person is in the same            behavior and emotions are  not changed over their last

        mental state each second             instantaneously interpret-           months or years of life.
        of the day; hence, there is  ed and used to justify the

        no guaranteed procedure              next line of questioning or  Even though no amount
        that will predict a person’s  responses.  In this sense, it  of questioning will reveal
        mood or actions.                     is no different from ba-             a person’s complete rep-

                                             sic forensic interviews or           ertoire of last thoughts,
        I mention this because               criminal interrogations.             we can achieve an idea of

        psychological autopsies              All rely on the interview-           their frame of mind, based
        have been criticized for             ee’s cognitive and emo-              on their previous and past
        not being standardized.  I           tional responses.                    actions, relationships,

        agree checklists are con-                                                 successes and failures,
        venient, but as an inter-            Although coined in the               daily habits, changes in

        viewer, not all checklists           late 1950’s, elements of             behavioral patterns, along
        are appropriate for all              psychological autopsies              with fears and goals.  It is
        interviews.  Psychologi-             are conducted every time             with these puzzle pieces

        cal autopsies are a type             a person dies or is mur-             that possible intentions of
        of extended forensic in-             dered.  It is human nature           a decedent may be ex-

        terview.  It is up to the            to want to know a person’s  plained.
        individual interviewer to            last thoughts and frame
        determine their outline              of mind.  On the unfortu-

        for questioning.  Starting           nate occasions of visiting             ~Michelle Doscher, PhD
        with existing information            funeral homes during a


    28
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33