Page 94 - 6 Persian Trade rep BUSHIRE 2_Neat
P. 94

2
                comparative jop'ilarity of the Bushirc-Sluraz-  only once exceeded imports during the   P^SSif
                Isfahan road, despite anarchy, blackmail and high  century and that was in the year 1914-15.
                rates of transport: hitherto Bu.shirc unlike Bandar
                Abbas hat not been the scene of much military   Comparison of Trade.
                activity, so that the few mules which have been
                left to ts by the brigand* and the local forwarding According to Customs statistics, Great Brit*,
                agency (Naqlieh) have not been diverted from India, and the Empire generally (including tj,?
                their unal commercial employment: and rates of year Mesopotamia and Egypt), h:ul the follow^
                hire on the Buihire road, however appalling (say j percentage of the total trade since 1000 :—   *
                £100 to Isfahan at the close of the year under
                review), still compare favourably with £140 and
                more per ton ria Ahwaz- At Bandar Abbas the       Per ccnt-          Pfr
                number of transport animals available is reported
                to have been considerably curtailed by the require­  1901  . 66  1910-11  ;o
                ments of the South Persia Rifles.
                                                      1902         . 03   1911-12       C5
                  It is perhaps not too much to say that military
                or gendarmerie operations on any considerable  1903  . 49  1912-13      CS
                scale in this region would in all probability result   1904  . 55  1913-14
         \      in serious dislocation of trade by the historic
                Bushire route ; on the other hand, of course, such  1905  . 59  1914-15
         i
                opera*, ic ns, if successful, would mean a real open­
                ing of the road and resto ration of security .along  1906-07  . 62  1915-16  9/3
                it which might lead to the normalisation of the    . 77   1916-17
                Kran Exchange and other blessings. If more­  1907-08                   S>J
                over the light railway from Bushire to Daliki, 1003-09   . 70  1937-18  9-75
               which Las been recommended by this Consulate-
                General since 1913, could be introduced and   1909-10  . 68
               utilised for commercial purposes, this would solve
                the transport difEculty over 3 out of the 10 stages
               from here to Shiraz: the dredging of the outer   But imports from Japan, which are believed !
               bar so as to allow all merchant steamers visiting  have been considerable, are included id the abotf
               the port to coroe to the inner instead of the outer  figure of 9G'25 per cent, owing to declarationsd
               anchorage (2| miles instead of 8) would be  origin supplied to the.Castoms giving India—tl-
               another and a priceless boon.         country of transhipment or intermediate conntn
                 Exports. — As stated above, went from 3,001   of supply—as the country of origin. Japan?;-
               tons valued at £443,434 to 2,7-46 tons valued at   matches, piece-goods, glassware, loaf sup*,
               £820,951. Increased export was principally   haberdashery, and now beer, continue to arrive
               noticeable in almonds, gum tmgacanth, raw cotton   Their quantity cannot be estimated as there a.*:
               and opium (£286,338 to £622,488-84 to 164   no Japanese agents in Bushire, hut Perris:
               tons);.on the other hand no wheat and barley   merchants receive Japanese goods ordered a:i
               were exported—there being an embargo - and   shipped by Persian friends in Bombay. X<-
               there was a decline in gum insoluble, spices, carpets   competition is feared in piece-goods owing to tb
               and a few other articles.             low quality of the Japanese article, and matches,
                                                     etc., although inferior, are welcomed in tte
                 Exports for the past 5 years have been: —  absence of similar goods from Europe in war
                                                     time.
                                  Ton*.    £           Of the total imports India is shown as hariu?
                                                     provided 92\ per cent., United Kingdom 5 p£
                   1923- 14 .     6,600   (601,765)  cent, as compared with 79J per cent, and 1G P=:
                   1924- 15 .   . 6,723   (719,171)   cent, respectively, last year (1916-17 >. Of tie
                   1916-16 .    . 3,863   (683,056)   total exports India took 1869 percent aa-j
                   1916- 17 .   . 3,001   (443,434)   United Kingdom 34*67 per cent, as against
                   1917- 18 .  ,   . 2,746  (820,951)  per cent, and 35*78 per cent, last year; 30S3f*’
                                                     cent, went to Singapore (Opium).   . ;I
                 It will be coted that imports again largely   Of the 92 J percent, shown as "from Indi*f
              exceeded exports, which is generally supposed to a goodly proportion would probably be gG-od* 1‘
              be economically unsound; in fact exports have , British manufacture.
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99