Page 27 - ASBIRES-2017_Preceedings
P. 27

Dayarathne, Ekanayake & Appuhamy



                     profit. Therefore, it is worthwhile to identify   service by comparing their expectation with
                     factors that influence to produce low quality     perception.  Service  quality  is  an  important
                     products before it comes to the final stage.      tool  to  measure  customer  satisfaction
                     Therefore, the  main objective of this study      (Hazlina, 2011).Empirical studies show that
                     was  to  explor  the  factors  that  affect  the   the  quality  of  service  offered  is  related  to
                     quality status of employees who produce IT        overall  satisfaction  of  the  customer.
                     products  offered  by  Orange  IT.  This  helps   According  to  Jamal  and  Anastasiadou
                     the  company  to  keep  their  customrers’        (2009),  reliability,  tangibility  and  empathy
                     goodwill and gain new business.                   positively related with customer satisfaction.
                                                                       Sulieman  (2011)  found  that  reliability,
                            2 LITERATURE REVIEW                        tangibility,  responsiveness  and  assurance
                                                                       have  significant  and  positive  relationship
                         Defining  service  quality  is  difficult     with  customer  satisfaction.  Meanwhile
                     when  compared  to  product  quality  due  to     empathy was found to have a significant and
                     some  features  unique  to  services  including   negative  effect  on  customer  satisfaction.
                     intangibility,  inseparability,  heterogeneity    Moreover,  the  result  of  Ravichandran
                     and  perishability  (Chang  &  Yeh,  2002).  In   (2010),  indicates  that  responsiveness  is  the
                     the   presence    of    these   limitations,      only significant dimension of service quality
                     Parasuraman,  Zeithaml,  &  Berry,  (1985)        that  affects  the  satisfaction  of  customers
                     came  up  with  a  comprehensive  way  of         positively.
                     defining  service  quality.  Parasuraman,                    3 METHODOLOGY
                     Zeithaml  and  Berry  (1985)  argued  that
                     service  quality  can  be  defined  as  the            This study is based on the primary data
                     difference  between  predicted  or  expected      obtained  from  a  questionnaire  distributed
                     service  and  perceived  service.  When           among employees of Orange IT. Employees
                     expectations  are  exceeded,  service  is         of four project were chosen to carry out the
                     perceived to be exceptional quality and also      study which are named as TSR (Traffic Sign
                     to be a pleasant surprise. When expectations      Recognition),  VD  (Vehicle  Detection),  RD
                     are  not  met,  however,  service  quality        (Road Detection), PD (Pedestrian Detection)
                     deemed    to    be   unacceptable.   When         . In each month each employee quality will
                     expectations  are  confirmed  by  perceived       be ranked according to three criteria as A, B
                     service,  quality  is  satisfactory.  Service     and C. Employees who belong to category A
                     quality  has  been  defined  in  different  ways   have  a  quality  level  above  99.5%  and  it  is
                     by  researchers.  Gronroos  (1978)  suggested     the  accepted  quality  level  for  the  products.
                     that  service  quality  is  made  up  of  two     Therefore,  employees  who  were  ranked
                     components  as  technical  quality  and           under the category A, are not being used for
                     functional quality.                               the analysis because there is no quality issue
                         Technical  quality  refers  to  what  the     with  these  employees.  Quality  level  of
                     service provider delivers during the service      category B lies between 99.5% and 99% and
                     provision while functional quality is how the     quality level of category C lies between 90%
                     service  employee  provides  the  service.        and  98.5%.  Employees  who  were  ranked
                     Parasuraman  et  al.,  (1988)  defined  service   under categories B and C were used for the
                     quality  as  a  difference  between  customer     analysis  because  frequent  product  returns
                     expectation  of  service  and  customers’         occurred  due  to  the  quality  issues  in  these
                     perceptions  of  the  actual  service.  Kasper    categories.    The  data  were  collected  from
                     (1999) defined service quality as the degree      each  project  and  employees  are  working
                     to which the service offered can satisfy the      under  these  projects  in  Sri  Lanka.  The
                     expectations of the user.  According to these     internal consistency of the questionnaire was
                     definitions, customers are the sole judges of     tested using cronbach’s alpha test. Then the
                     service quality. If they perceive it to be good   graphical  method  was  used  to  summerize
                     service, then it is. They assess the quality of   personal  data  of  employees  who  belong  to




                                                                     17
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32