Page 514 - Area X - G

Republic of the Philippines
IFUGAO STATE UNIVERSITY
Lamut, Ifugao

POLICY PROPOSAL
Title : Refined Performance Indicators for Performance Management of Delivery/Service Units
Effective F.Y. 2017
Proponents : DPIM and PMT
Date : October 7,2016

I. Rationale

One of the principles of total quality management is continuous improvement. Like
entrepreneurs who continuously seek for ways to improve their products to delight their
customers, the University continues to find solutions to existing problems in performance
management in order to improve the quality of services.
This proposed table of reference contains the refined performance indicators to measure
performance of delivery units (divisions and campuses) and service units (service departments
and colleges) in the institution. With the principles of cascading of logical frameworks to make
the performance indicators outcome-based and taking in consideration the performance
indicators for PBB evaluation, SUC Leveling, and Normative Financing Scheme Report which
are being used to assess the performance of SUCs, the performance indicators were revised and
refined appropriately. Hence, this proposal.
II. Objectives
A. Phase 1 - Refined Pis for Office Performance Management
1. Prepare a table of reference for office performance management containing refined
indicators of performance of functions in relation to implementation of programs,
projects, and activities of the office which are geared towards attainment of the goals of
the university considering the principles of cascading logical frameworks of the results-
based performance management system, the performance indicators from the PBB
evaluation, SUC Leveling, and Normative Financing Scheme;
2. Make the preparation of OPCR friendlier to delivery units that will result to:
a. further refinement of the OPCR and IPCR templates; and
b. preparation for table of reference for individual performance management.

B. Phase 2 - Refined Pis for Individual Performance Management
1. Prepare a table of reference for individual performance management containing Pis of
performance of functions aligned to the programs/projects and activities of the office
and the organization/institution.
2. Refine the OPCR and IPCR forms to make it friendlier and easier to prepare.

III. Factors/ Parameters Considered in the Refinement of the Performance Indicators

1. Outcome-based monitoring & evaluation — Performance is measured based on the
outcomes. The outcomes were identified through the principles of the results-based
performance management system (cascading of logical frameworks) and adopting the
performance indicators from the PBB evaluation, SUC Leveling, and Normative Financing
Scheme.
2. Categories of Functions - For proper delineation of the categories of functions for
delivery/service units, the definitions were made simple as follows:
a. Strategic Priority Functions - Those that directly affect the MFOs, STO and GASS
outputs of the University as specified in the GAA.
b. Core Functions - Refers to the functions that are inherent to the office.
c. Support Functions —These are functions in support to other offices or agency.

If Core or Support Functions are identified as Strategic Priority Functions, they shall be
presented under the Strategic Priority Functions.

1