Page 370 - Six Sigma Advanced Tools for Black Belts and Master Black Belts
P. 370

OTE/SPH
 OTE/SPH
                              Char Count= 0
                         3:8
          August 31, 2006
 JWBK119-23
                             Detecting Outliers and Level Shifts             355
      data; and Zhang, 25  Noorossana and Vaghefi 30  and Kalgonda and Kulkarni 31  who
      looked into control charts for multivariate autoregressive processes.
        Although much work has been done on statistical control of autocorrelated pro-
      cesses, there has hitherto been no single method that is widely accepted or proven to
      be effective in most situations. It is our opinion that the most promising approach is the
      use of a newly conceived statistic. In the following, we present the scheme proposed
                    15
      by Atienza et al. for monitoring autocorrelated processes. We focus on studying the
      behavior of the statistic λ LS,t used for detecting level shifts in an AR(1) process. The
      performance of the scheme is evaluated and a comparison with Alwan and Roberts’s
      SCC is made.


                23.2 DETECTING OUTLIERS AND LEVEL SHIFTS

      Consider the ARMA model
        φ(B)Z t = φ 0 + θ(B)ε t ,                                          (23.1)

      where Z t is a stationary time series representing the process measurements,
                           2
        φ(B) = 1 − φ 1 B − φ 2 B − ··· − φ p B p
      is an autoregressive polynomial of order p,
                           2
        θ(B) = 1 − θ 1 B − θ 2 B − ··· − θ q B q
      is a moving average polynomial of order q, B is the backshift operator, and {ε t } is
      a sequence of normally and independently distributed random errors with mean
                                2
      zero and constant variance σ . Without loss of generality, we assume that the level
                                               ˆ
      φ 0 of the time series {Z t } is zero. If we let Z t represent the predicted value ob-
      tained from an appropriately identified and fitted ARMA model, then the residuals
                ˆ
                             ˆ
                                            ˆ

       e 1 = Z 1 − Z 1 , e 2 = Z 2 − Z 2 ,..., e t = Z t − Z t ,... will behave like independent and
      identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables. 32
        Let
                   θ(B)
        Y t = f (t) +  ε t ,                                               (23.2)
                   φ(B)
      where Y t and f (t) represent the ‘contaminated’ series and the anomalous exogenous
      disturbances such as outliers and level shifts, respectively. The function f (t) may be
      deterministic or stochastic, depending on the type of disturbance. For a deterministic
      model, f (t) is of the form
                ω(B) (d)
        f (t) = ω 0  ξ t  ,                                                (23.3)
                 δ(B)
      where

         (d)   1,   if t = d,
        ξ t  =
               0,   if t  = d,
      is an indicator variable for the occurrence of a disturbance at time d, ω(B) and δ(B)
      are backshift polynomials describing the dynamic effect of the disturbance on Y t , and
   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375