Page 269 - Maxwell House
P. 269

Chapter 5                                                               249



                                                                                th
             > . As we have mentioned before, the positive δ indicates the zero delay in the N  element
            and maximum lag-delay in the zeroth element (see Figure 5.4.9 and 5.4.10). Evidently, it can
            be arranged by sending the excitation wave in the direction z < 0 instead of z > 0, as before. If
            so, the reverse in propagation may be taken into account by counting the elevation angle  from
            the axis z < 0 and thereby replacing  →  +  in (5.89). It thus means that all plots in Figures
            5.4.10 and 5.4.11 must be rotated 180°. Now the beam peaks lean to the left coming closer
            toward the array z-axis in the direction of traveling wave propagation again.

                                                      5.4.8   Continuous Linear Array


                                                      The transition process to a linear array of a
                                                      continuous distribution of  isotropic
                                                      radiators is quite straightforward. Let  us
                                                      look back to expression (5.89) and assume
                     Sector of
                    Grating Lobes,
                    Discrete Array                    that the interelement separation  reduces
                                                      while  the number of elements   + 1  in
                                                      array increases in such a way that the full
                                                      antenna length   =   is kept  constant.

                                                      Putting  as before that   = −  =
                                                                                   
                                                      −(/ ) and  = / we have for the
                                                             
                                                      magnitude of  normalized to the peak
               Figure 5.4.12 Patterns of discrete (dotted   antenna factor
               lines with *marker) and continuous (solid              +1
                     lines with ° marker) array        () = lim  sin �    (cos−/  )/2�  =
                                                               →∞ (+1)sin �  (cos−/  )/2�
                                                                          
                                                          sin  ((cos−/  )/2)
                                                                                     (5.90)
                                                             (cos−/  )/2
                                                 
            Here the well-known approximation sin � � ≅    as    → 0 in the denominator and the fact
                                                  
                   +1
            that  lim  = 1 were applied. Figure 5.4.12 illustrates the patterns created by the discrete and
               →∞ 
            continuous linear array of the same length. Simple appraisal leads to the conclusion that the
            main beam shapes of both arrays are practically indistinguishable. The only real difference is
            the grating lobes that are absent in continuous array. Remember that according to the above
            phasor diagram analysis the grating lobe forms as the phase shift between adjacent elements
            reaches 2.  But in continuous arrays the interelement separation is infinitesimal in the same
            way as the phase shift  between them. Therefore, the grating lobes cannot be created by
            definition in any antenna with continuous source distribution.
   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274