Page 267 - Maxwell House
P. 267

Chapter 5                                                               247

            Note that packaging, cooling, reliability, electrical efficiency, weight, and cost are the dominant
            issues of concern for T/R modules since modern communication and radar AESAs comprise
            several thousand or even tens of thousands active radiators. Therefore, just a ten dollar reduction
            in T/R cost can save a million dollars in overall antenna cost.

            5.4.7   Radiation of Linear Array with Progressive Phase Excitation

            Let us come back to expression (5.86) assuming for simplicity that | | =  ,  ≥ 0 and the
                                                                          0
                                                                    
            phase shift between two successive radiators is constant, i.e.  = ,  = . ≠ 0. If so,
                                                               
            the array factor in (5.86) can be written in compact form as
                            () =  ∑    (−)  =   sin ((+1)(−)/2)   (−)/2     (5.89)
                                    0  =0       0
                                                              ⁄
                                                        sin ((−) 2)
            where  = −cos. Here we apply the same expression for a geometric progression sum as
            in (5.87). A series of 3D patterns normalized to the peak are put in the top row of Figure 5.4.10
            for  = ⁄2 ,   = 0, −⁄4, − /2, −3⁄4,  −/2. Note that all these patterns are cut
            in half to illustrate the beam shape. Meanwhile, the entire  patterns are circularly symmetric
            about the z-axis. The polar plots in low row of Figure 5.4.10 represent the set of corresponding
            elevation cuts. The bottom line of numbers is the array directivity D normalized to the pattern
            peak and calculated using (5.47). The number of radiators   + 1 = 5 was chosen to be
            relatively  low  to  clearly  demonstrate  the  formation  of  patterns  vs.  phase  shift  between  the
            radiators.




















              Figure 5.4.10 Pattern variations: 3D blue images in top raw and their elevation cuts bellow
            Looking at these plots, we can conclude that

             = . All isotropic elements are excited in phase. Therefore, the linear array forms  the
            omnidirectional in azimuth plane  doughnut shaped  3D-pattern with  peak radiation
            perpendicular to the array axis. In polar coordinates the elevation pattern is bidirectional with
            two peaks at  = ±90°. The 3dB beamwidth of each beam is about 42° and D = 4.32 dBi.
             = −   = −   = = −. °. The 3D-pattern formed by forward  a  traveling  wave
                    ⁄
                            ⁄
            takes the shape of a conical beam with two peaks at  = ±75.5° in elevation cut meaning that
            the peaks are tilted closer toward the array axis. The main beams continues to be split and widen
            up to 44°. The directivity drops a little to 4.26 dBi mostly as a result of a tiny increase in this
   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272