Page 262 - Maxwell House
P. 262

242                                                       ANTENNA BASICS

        together and displayed by the set of green points. Note that the adjacent radiator separation d
        between the even array elements corresponds to the actual distance in wavelength.















              Figure 5.4.6 Normalized array factor of 5 elements array providing SLL = -20dB

        It is clear that the beamwidth diminishes, but the number of sidelobes grows as the separation
        increases while SLL stays unaffected. The situation changes if the radiators are not isotropic
        and possess some directivity. The right-hand plot in Figure 5.4.6 illustrates the same linear array
        pattern with Huygens’ radiators. The back radiation (around  = 180°) is suppressed quite well
        though we lost overall about 5dB in SLL. Evidently, this effect must be kept in mind as we
        formulate the synthesis SLL specifications. The Dolph-Chebyshev synthesis allows us to solve
        two practically important problems: a) for any given number of radiators and SLL to develop
        an  array  that has  the  slimmest beamwidth  or  b)  for  any given number  of  radiators  and
        beamwidth  to build an  array  that provides  the  lowest SLL.  In  practice,  there  are  certain
        systematic or random errors in the excitation amplitude and phase, manufacturing inaccuracies
        like variations in the interelement spacing and individual element's radiation pattern, as well
        as  deviations  in  magnitudes  and  phases  of  signals  feeding  individual  elements. The critical
        issue is an interaction between array radiators through the join  near-field.  If so, the actual
        radiation pattern of the array  may more or less deviate from the theoretical.
        Unfortunately, the Dolph-Chebyshev arrays are rather sensitive to such kind of errors, and their
        production requires an extremely sophisticated technology.


        5.4.5   Phasor-Vector Interpretation of Array Pattern
        Let us come back to (5.73) for array factor
                                 () = ∑        ,  = −cos �     (5.86)
                                           
                                       =0
                                         = | |   
                                              
                                         
        Here | | and   is the  -element excitation magnitude and phase, respectively. To simplify
                            ℎ
                     
              
        the subsequent considerations without loss of generality, we assume that all array elements are
        located above the xy-plane, the array excitation is uniform, i.e. | | = const. ,  ≥ 0, while the
                                                            
        initial phase shift between elements   = 0. We will study several special and important cases
                                       
        of  ≠ 0 later. It is worthwhile to point out that the uniformly excited array is one of the rare
           
        cases where  an array factor can be analyzed analytically  without numerical assessment.
        Eventually, the series in (5.86) becomes a geometric progression with common ratio   and
                                                                              
        can be modified as ( = 1, for simplicity)
                         
                                              (+1)
                                            1−          sin (/2)
                         () = ∑       =  =   /2         (5.87)
                                  =0        
                                                                ⁄
                                             1−          sin ( 2)
   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267