Page 334 - Maxwell House
P. 334

314                                                                Chapter 6



        heat sink radiators on its external surface, etc.  The  normalized attenuation  coefficient  (see
        Figure 6.6.7) illustrating the attenuation in WR because of skin effect is

                                            1 1+(2/)( 2) 2
                                                     ⁄
                                  ∗ ()/ =   [S⋅m]                (6.34)
                                        
                                                   ⁄
                                            0  �1−( 2) 2
        The most critical parameter is the ratio /, since the WR of reduced height contributes a
        greater loss due to the higher wall current density.














         Figure 6.6.7 Normalized a) attenuation coefficient and b) characteristic impedance for WR.
        The standard WR-2300 designated for frequency band 320 – 490 MHz brings in the attenuation
        of 0.12 dB per 100 m (!), i.e. 3% of energy is lost in this length. But the attenuation jumps to
        14.8 dB/m, i.e. now the same 3% of energy is lost in the range  of 1 (!) cm only. All these data
                                                          14
        illustrate WR pros and cons: bulky and heavy but the champion in power rating, energy loss,
        and obviously in crosstalk insulation. Coaxial cable is inferior to the WR at all frequencies
        regarding power handling and attenuation.
        Note that as  → 2, i.e. as  →  , the WR ability to carry power  with low loss is highly
                                    
        compromised. The power reduces to zero while the attenuation jumps to infinity. The roots of
        such “bad” behavior are in the ways of the partial plane wave propagation. According to (6.20)
        and the drawing in Figure 6.4.4 the incident and reflected angle of these waves tends to zero
        that greatly slows down the wave propagation along a WR. Simultaneously, the z-component
        of their Poynting’s vector drops while the attenuation sharply increases as the partial waves
        touch the metal walls more frequently. But how about if the wavelength crosses the threshold
         =  = 2 becoming longer, i.e.  > 2 and  ≤  ? According to (6.33) the power carried
                                                   
             
        by the WR wave becomes pure reactive meaning that the free energy propagation completely
        stops. Consequently, we cannot speak about the active energy transfer since according to (6.21)
                                                        15
        the propagation constant  = −|| = − �(  ) − 1   and
                                                   2
                                               ⁄
                                           0     
                                 =  sin (/)  −||   ⎫
                                                      
                                 
                                      0
                                   ||       −||   ⎪
                              =     sin (/)          (6.35)
                               
                                        0
                                   0  
                                                            ⎬
                                  /      −|| 
                              =     cos (/)    ⎪
                              
                                        0
                                   0    ⎭
        14  It is not bad because WRs connecting the circuit elements in mm wavelength band are typically short.
        15  The minus sign is chosen to get the physically sound solution meaning that the EM energy stored in
        WR is finite.
   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339