Page 28 - Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI) Edisi Kedua
P. 28

4                             Pengantar Pemahaman Konsepsi Dasar Sekitar …



                  B.  PERISTILAHAN

                  Sedari awal, istilah IPR sendiri tampaknya telah diliputi dua macam
                  persoalan. Pertama, kehadiran kata "rights". Kedua, adanya istilah

                  “intellectual property law” yang akhirnya juga memerlukan klarifikasi.
                  Beberapa ahli berpandangan, kehadiran kata “rights” dalam Intellec-
                  tual Property Rights dianggap berlebihan. Sebab, seperti dijelaskan
                  Phillips dan Firth, kata property yang berasal dari bahasa Latin, yaitu
                  proprius sudah berarti “kepemilikan sesuatu”. Dengan demikian,
                      If we bear this in mind, we can take the expression ‘intellectual
                      property’ to mean the legal rights which may be asserted in respect

                      of the product of the human intellect, ... .
                                                           5
                      Dalam soal peristilahan ini, penjelasan Sherwood tampaknya

                  lebih mampu memberi gambaran mengenai problem tadi.
                      The term ‘intellectual property’ contains both the concept of pri-
                      vate creativity and the concept of public protection for the result
                      of that creativity. Said another way, invention and creative ex-
                      pression plus protection equals ‘intellectual property’. Property, of
                      course, is a relative concept in virtually all legal systems.

                      To help clarify the concept of intellectual property, it can be noted
                      that the term ‘intellectual property rights’ is a redundant expression.
                      The concept of rights is, of course, implicit in any understanding of
                      property. That the redundant term is in common usage, however,
                      seems to reflect the lack of any other convenient collective term
                      for those ideas, inventions and creative expressions which, when
                      accorded public protection, give rise to the concept of intellectual
                              6
                      property.




                  5   Phillips., Jeremy, dan Firth. Alison, 1990, Introduction to Intellectual Property Law, But­
                      terwoths, London, Dublin, Edinburgh, hlm. 3.
                  6   Sherwood. Robert M., 1990, Intellectual Property and Economic Development, Westvi­
                      ew Press, Boulder, San Francisco & Oxford, hlm. 12.
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33