Page 59 - The Dark Spell of Darwinism

Harun Yahya - Adnan Oktar

being rendered, by natural selection, more and more aquatic in their habits,
with larger and larger mouths, till a creature was produced as monstrous as a
whale." Interestingly, Darwin retracted this example in all later editions of his
book.

This has not stopped later evolutionists. For example, the ancient ancestors of
whales, writes the late Sir Gavin de Beer, ". . . had dentitions enabling them to
feed on large animals, but some took to preying on fish and rapidly evolved
teeth like sharks. . . . Next, some whales preyed on small cuttlefish and evolved
a reduced dentition. Finally the whalebone whales, having taken to feeding on
enormous numbers of small shrimps, also evolved rapidly." 29
The only difference between Schindewolf and Goldschmidt on the one
hand and Darwin on the other is that the first two say that a different species
hatched suddenly from an egg, while the latter claimed that a bear who goes
in and out of the water gradually turns into a whale. Although 150 years
separates them, there's been no development or progress in their informa-
tion or the logic with which they shape
those facts.

From this illus-
tration of the
evolutionists'
"hopeful mon-
ster," their the-
ory seems no
more convincing
than imaginary
cartoons or chil-
dren's stories.