Page 38 - The Evolution Deceit

36 THE EV O LU TION DE CEIT

Blind Materialism

The false faith that we are talking about is the materialistic philoso-
phy, which argues that matter has existed for all eternity and there is noth-
ing other than matter. The theory of evolution is the so-called "scientific
foundation" for this materialistic philosophy and that theory is blindly de-
fended in order to uphold this philosophy. When science invalidates the
claims of evolution-and that is the very point that has been reached at the
end of the 20th century-it then is sought to be distorted and brought into
a position where it supports evolution for the sake of keeping materialism
alive.
A few lines written by one of the prominent evolutionist biologists of
Turkey is a good example that enables us to see the disordered judgement
and discretion that this blind devotion leads to. This scientist discusses the
probability of the coincidental formation of Cytochrome-C, which is one of
the most essential enzymes for life, as follows:
The probability of the formation of a Cytochrome-C sequence is as likely as
zero. That is, if life requires a certain sequence, it can be said that this has a
probability likely to be realised once in the whole universe. Otherwise, some
metaphysical powers beyond our definition should have acted in its forma-
tion. To accept the latter is not appropriate to the goals of science. We there-
fore have to look into the first hypothesis. 2
This scientist finds it "more scientific" to accept a possibility "as likely
as zero" rather than creation. However according to the rules of science, if
there are two alternative explanations concerning an event and if one of
them has "as likely as zero" a possibility of realisation, then the other one
is the correct alternative. However the dogmatic materialistic approach
forbids the admittance of a superior Creator. This prohibition drives this
scientist-and many others who believe in the same materialist dogma-to
accept claims that are completely contrary to reason.
People who believe and trust these scientists also become enthralled
and blinded by the same materialistic spell and they adopt the same indif-
ference when reading their books and articles.
This dogmatic materialistic point of view is the reason why many
prominent names in the scientific community are atheists. Those who free
themselves from the thrall of this spell and think with an open mind do
not hesitate to accept the existence of a Creator. American biochemist Dr
Michael J. Behe, one of those prominent names who support the move-