Page 181 - Records of Bahrain (7) (ii)_Neat
P. 181

Bahrain'-Qatar dispute over Zubarah, 1953-1960    571

                                                                          '7A
       108i)                                     BRITISH RESIDENCY,
                                                     BAHRAIN.
                                                          October 31 t i960.
                                 CONFIDENTIAL



                                                   T>A (08>/4
                 ■/c ixy i) V(U/ fo   /
               I liavo been giving Rome thought to the question of the
          Bahrair/Qatar seabed and the Zubarah dispute,     Correspondence
          on the former rests with your letter BA. 1531/27 of August 3
          to the Political Resident and on the latter with George
          Middleton* s letter 1081/1 of September 20 to Robert Walmsley.
          2.   I am more and more convinced that wo shall hever make any.
          progress on the seabed as long as Shaikh Salman continues to
          nurco his grievance and 3ensc of frustration over Zubarah.
          His attitude towards (anything connected with Qatar is completely
          poisoned by the Zubaijah issue and I do not consider that we shall
          make any headway if we go back again and try to explain to him
          the generally agreed (international rules affecting the division
          of scabedo. I am sure that directly we 3tart talking about
          this subject his reaction will be exactly the same as when we
          started talking to hijm about it earlier this year:   lie will
          maintain his extreme claim to -the 60a between Zubarah and
          Bahrain and to the p<jarl beds north of Qatar ( ooe Ted Wiltshire* s
          minute enclosed in my letter 1^531/3 of April 19 to Walmsley).
          The last time   the Political Resident diocussed the subject  with
          the Ruler was  on July 18 when jShaikh Salman went over sill  the
          old ground about fishing and p.earling rights at great length.
          George Middleton triad unsuccessfully to explain that this
          was not a matter which could b'c fixed between Bahrain and Her
          Majesty's Government) but had |to be internationally acceptable;
          and that fishing rights did not necessarily confer seabed rights.
          But Middleton did not think apy of this penetrated the Ruler's
          mind.

          3.   Since Middleton went on leave in September I have
          deliberately refrained from rcising either the seabed or the
          Zubarah issues with the Ruler. When I took the First Lord of
          the Admiralty to cal!), on Shaikh Salman at the beginning of
          October, we had a liyely discussion about a whole range of
           topics including development in Bahrain and at the very ond of
          the conversation Shaikh Salman rather naughtily got on to
          Zubarah and the seabed saying (that he was waiting for
          satisfaction from II.M.G. As we had already stayed much longer
           than Lord Carrington's prograiiune would aliow and knowing what
          we v/ere in for, I merely told !the Ruler that, as he knew, we
          v/e re doing our best to study and to try and solve these very
          tricky problems and that I could put the First Lord fully in
           the picture without taking any more of His Highness's time.
          4®   It seems to me that these tv/o problems of the sedbed
           and Zubarah are inextricably United and that we can only hope
          to make progress on the former if we can give Shaikh Salman
           some satisfaction on the latter (you will have seen from
          paragraph 2 of Middleton's letter 1531/3 of June 6 that Shaikh
    R.A. Beaumont Esq., G.MoG. , 0oB.E  • 9      \                  /Salman's. • •
           Foreign Office,
                 London, S.W.1.


                                       CONFIDENTIAL
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186