Page 232 - Sách năm 2022 - Fulltext - hieu final
P. 232
TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO
1. Trần Thành Vinh, Nguyễn Thị Huệ, Phước Sang, cs. Ứng dụng phương pháp six sigma trong kiểm soát
chất lượng phòng xét nghiệm hoá sinh, Y học Thành Phố HCM 2019; 23(6): 335-342.
2. Cao S, Qin X. Application of Sigma metrics in assessing the clinical performance of verified versus non-
verified reagents for routine biochemical analytes. Biochemia Med (Zagreb) 2018; 28(2): 215-221.
3. Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin Chem 2007
Jul; 53(7): 1338-1342.
4. Coskun, Abdurrahman. Six Sigma and laboratory consultation. Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine
2007; 45(1): 121-123.
5. DeFrance A, Armbruster D, Petty D, et al. Abbott Architect clinical chemistry and immunoassay systems:
digoxin assays are free of interferences from spironolactone, potassium canrenoate, and their common
metabolite canrenone. Ther Drug Monit 2007; 33(1): 128-131.
6. Mekhala K P. A retrospective study to evaluate the performance of internal quality control in a
biochemistry laboratory using sigma metrics.International Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and
Research 2019; 7(4): 426–429.
7. Tran MTC, Hoang KT, Greaves RF. Practical application of biological variation and Sigma metrics
quality models to evaluate 20 chemistry analytes on the Beckman Coulter AU680. Clin Biochem 2016
Nov; 49(16-17): 1259-1266.
8. Westgard JO. Statistical quality control procedures. Clin Lab Med 2013 Mar; 33(1): 111-124.
232