Page 232 - Sách năm 2022 - Fulltext - hieu final
P. 232

TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO

             1. Trần Thành Vinh, Nguyễn Thị Huệ, Phước Sang, cs. Ứng dụng phương pháp six sigma trong kiểm soát
                chất lượng phòng xét nghiệm hoá sinh, Y học Thành Phố HCM 2019; 23(6): 335-342.
            2. Cao S, Qin X. Application of Sigma metrics in assessing the clinical performance of verified versus non-
                verified reagents for routine biochemical analytes. Biochemia Med (Zagreb) 2018; 28(2): 215-221.
            3.  Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin Chem 2007
                Jul; 53(7): 1338-1342.
            4. Coskun, Abdurrahman. Six Sigma and laboratory consultation. Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine
                2007; 45(1): 121-123.
            5. DeFrance A, Armbruster D, Petty D, et al. Abbott Architect clinical chemistry and immunoassay systems:
                digoxin assays are free of interferences from spironolactone, potassium canrenoate, and their common
                metabolite canrenone. Ther Drug Monit 2007; 33(1): 128-131.
            6.    Mekhala  K  P.  A  retrospective  study  to  evaluate  the  performance  of  internal  quality  control  in  a
               biochemistry  laboratory  using  sigma  metrics.International  Journal  of  Clinical  Biochemistry  and
               Research 2019; 7(4): 426–429.
            7. Tran MTC, Hoang KT, Greaves RF. Practical application of biological variation and Sigma  metrics
                quality models to evaluate 20 chemistry analytes on the Beckman Coulter AU680. Clin Biochem 2016
                Nov; 49(16-17): 1259-1266.
            8. Westgard JO. Statistical quality control procedures. Clin Lab Med 2013 Mar; 33(1): 111-124.
















































                                                                                                      232
   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237