Page 197 - 4- Leading_from_Within
P. 197

possible in  a reasonable time frame.    Naïve questions  should be
               encouraged because they help members break out of their traditional way
               of viewing the situation and question assumptions that may no longer be
               valid.


               To facilitate the identification  of the root cause, the Japanese have
               developed a procedure called the  five whys.   They ask  “why” five times
               when confronted with a problem.  By the time the fifth why is answered,
               they believe they  have found the ultimate cause of the problem.  For

               example, revenues for the organization have declined  over the past two
               years.

                   1.  Why have the revenues been declining?
                       Answer: the funders have been dissatisfied with the results of the

                       organization’s efforts.

                   2.  Why have the funders been dissatisfied?
                       Answer:   they haven’t  understood  that the community has no
                       suitable sites or buildings for new business.


                   3.  Why haven’t they understood?
                       Answer:  because we (the staff of the organization) haven’t done a
                       good job of explaining the real estate problem

                   4.  Why haven’t we done a good job of explaining?

                       Answer:   we haven’t provided our  stakeholders  with  a good
                       education and training program so that they understand broad
                       economic development trends and how they impact our community.

                   5.  Why haven’t we provided this training?
                       Answer:   we didn’t think it was important.


               Generally, as the team or organization delves into the problem and its
               possible causes, it will become clear that needed information is missing and
               additional information is needed to better understand what is happening
               and why.  Frequently, this involves  looking  at  what other organizations

               have done in a similar situation or reviewing the literature on the topic.  It
               is also useful to determine what information is irrelevant to the problem.

               The results of this research should be properly organized so that it can be



               David Kolzow                                                                          197
   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202