Page 313 - Area_VI_Parameter_A
P. 313

30


                              B.  Objectives.  The objectives of conducting annual agency in-house review are


                                 to:

                                   Encourage faculty and staff to write their extension works and outputs;


                                   Present the extension activities of the different colleges and campuses;


                                   Recognize  and  award  commendable  extension  programs,  projects  and

                                     activities;

                                   Document results of extension programs, projects and activities; and


                                   Acquire effective and innovative techniques and/or strategies in extension


                              C.  Schedule.    The  reviews  shall  be  conducted  at  least  twice  a  year  to  select

                                 papers in time for the regional reviews and publication.

                              D.  Evaluation Panel.  The University shall notify STAARRDEC regarding the


                                 upcoming  agency  in-house  review  to  identify  external  evaluators  of  the

                                 extension projects. The evaluators shall be composed of the following:


                                   Experts within the University or experts from other HEIs

                                   Members of the national/regional commodity R&E team/pool of experts


                                   Farmer co-operators


                                   Representatives  from  funding  agencies  (e.g.  PCAARRD,  DA-BAR,

                                     CHED, etc.)

                              E.  Evaluation Criteria.     The major criteria that shall be used in  evaluating


                                 the ongoing extension projects are the following:

                                   Attainment of the objectives


                                   Adherence to the approved methodology or recommendation of more

                                     appropriate methodology
   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318