Page 215 - BUKU SYNOPSIS
P. 215
reviewing their peer’s text and enhancing their self-reflection toward their
learning, which aligns with the study conducted by (Li & Gao, 2015; Vo &
Nguye, N.H, 2023). So, the less effective implementation of PA found by
several practitioners, such as Gielen et al. (2010), can be avoided. Therefore,
students evaluate their self and peers' work using teachers' criteria is necessary.
Consequently, if the criteria are inadequately formulated, it has a detrimental
impact on the quality of peer assessment. Therefore, the researcher took several
steps to reach the quality of the scoring rubric through experts’ validation and
field testing.
The notion of agency entails assuming responsibility for one's own
learning. However, agency development in students does not occur
spontaneously; it requires the teaching staff to provide students with proactive
chances for agency development. One practical approach to fostering agency
entails the provision of constructive feedback and the promotion of self-
reflection. Nieminen et al. (2021) claim that “Student agency is often
mentioned as a key feature of feedback practices (p. 1)”. By actively seeking
feedback from themselves, their peers, and their instructors, they demonstrate
a proactive approach to enhancing their learning process.
2. The Multipurpose Assessment Model Raises Students’ Awareness in
Communicative Text Production
The previous section presents students' active role in revising their text
through SA and PA, indicating they are aware of producing a communicative
210