Page 117 - Chayei Adam LAYOUT sivan 5782

םדא תועיקתה רדס - ב “ מק ללכ ייח

ּ

32
בתכש 'ג ק"ס א"מב ח"פקת 'יסב ןייעו( לֵסֹו ּפ י ִכ ָּה ּו ּ ל ִפֲא ,ה ֶשֲע ַמ ה ֶשֹוע ֹוני ֵא ַע ֵמֹו ּ ׁש ַה ְּד בַּג לַע
ר ֵח ַא לֹוק בֵּכ ַע ְּמ ִד אּוה ד ָּח ֶא ר ֶד ֵס ְּב א ָּק ְּודו ַ ְּ )'י ק"ס א"מב צ"קת 'יסב חכומ ןכו ,ןכ חכומ ן"רמד
ּ
ּ
ְּ
ּ
ֹוא ע ַק ָּּת ּו ּ ל ִפֲא ֶ ׁש ,הֶז ת ֶא הֶז ןי ִב ְּכ ַע ְּמ ןָּני ֵא םי ִר ָּד ְּּס ַה לָּבֲא .ר ֶד ֵס ֹותֹואְּל ךָּּי ַ ׁש ֹוני ֵא ֶ ׁש
ְּ
ּ
אלו ְּ 33 .ר ֵח ַא ןָּיְּנ ִע ְּב ןֵכ ְּו ,אָּצָּי ,ת" ַר ְּ ׁש ַּת ךָּּכ ר ַח ַא ת" ַ ׁש ַּת ֹוא ת" ַר ַּת ר ֶד ֵס הָּּ ל ִח ְּת ע ַמ ָּ ׁש
ֹ
ּ
ְּ
,ֹו ּב אֵצֹוּיַכ ְּו ת" ַ ׁש ַּת ע ַק ָּּת ךָּּכ ר ַח ַא ְּו ת" ַר ְּ ׁש ַּת 'ב ֹוא ת ַח ַא םַעַ ּפ ע ַמ ָּ ׁש ּו ּ ל ִפֲא אָּּ ל ֶא ,דֹוע
ּ
ּ
אָּני ִד ִמ י ֵרֲה ֶ ׁש ,בֵּכַע ְּמ ֹוני ֵא הֶז םַג ְּד ,הֶזָּּב אֵצֹוי ְּו ת" ַר ְּ ׁש ַּת 'ב ֹוא ת ַח ַא םַעַ ּפ ףֹו ּסַבְּל ע ַק ְּתִי
ְּ
ּ
34 : ן ָּּמ ַקְּל ִד ְּכ ד ָּח ֶא ר ֶד ֵס ת ַח ַא םַעַ ּפ הָּכ ָּר ְּב לַע ק ַר ,תֹוכ ָּר ְּב ר ֶד ֵס לַע ַעֹק ְּתִל ךי ִרָּצ ןי ֵא
ּ
ּ
ְּ
ְּ
ֹל
,ר ֶד ֵס ֹותֹואְּל ךָּּי ַ ׁש ֹוני ֵאש ֶ ׁ 3 1 ר ֵח ַא לֹוק ע ַמ ְּ ׁשִי ֹוא ע ַק ְּתִי אּ ֶ ׁש ךי ִרָּּצ ֶ ׁש ןָּויכ ֵּ ]בי[
ְּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
הָּע ָּּט ֶ ׁש ת" ַ ׁש ַת ְּב ןֵכ ְּו ,םי ִרָּב ְּ ׁשִל הָּעּור ְּת ַה םי ִד ְּקהו ִ ְּ 36 ת" ַר ְּ ׁש ַת ְּב ד ֵמֹוע הָּי ָּה ךָּכי ִפְּלּו
ּ
ּ

ּ

ה ָּשָּע ְּו הָּע ָּט ם ִא ת" ַר ַת ְּב ןֵכ ְּו , ָּהי ֶרֲח ַאְּל ֹוא םי ִרָּב ְּּ ׁש ַה יֵנ ְּפִל ןיֵּב הָּעּור ְּת םַּג ה ָּשָּע ְּו
םדו רשב
to fulfill the mitzva and one that is sounded shevarim in the third set of tekiah-shevarim-
without intent, but makes no distinction teruah-tekiah and he was instructed to start
between the person blowing shofar and the over, blowing three full sets of tekiah-shevarim
one who is listening. -teruah-tekiah. The Raavan and the Rosh
disagreed with this, both arguing that there
33. Although a minority opinion recorded was no need to begin all over again, and that
by the Tur requires him to begin again, the blowing the shofar unnecessarily violated the
halacha follows most rishonim who agree that rabbinic prohibition of sounding a shofar on
a foreign or unnecessary blast will only yom tov. However, while the Raavan agreed
invalidate that set (i.e. the teruah sound that the current set was lost and that a new
surrounded by two tekiahs). tekiah must be blown as well, the Rosh
concluded that this too, was unnecessary; he
34. See below siman 17 that during musaf reasoned that since both shevarim and teruah
blowing any single set is an acceptable are part of this set (tekiah-shevarim-teruah-
custom. Accordingly, even if we were to tekiah), a misplaced teruah is not considered
discount the earlier sets, blowing a single new an interruption of a foreign sound.
set would be sufficient. Accordingly, there is no need to blow the first
tekiah again.
35. See above (note 20), how in Magentza,
one year the baal tokeah only blew two 36. Although both shevarim and teruah

007