Page 335 - Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values 3rd Edition
P. 335

4. The transformation matrix Q can be obtained as:
            Q = L′P
                é 0.1659 - 0.0792ù          é  5.7651 2.6006ù
            Q =  ê               ú  and Q  - 1  =  ê        ú
                ë 0.0168  0.1755 û          ë - -0.5503 5.4495 û

        E.2   Canonical Transformation with Missing Records
        and Same Incidence Matrices

        Ducrocq and Besbes (1993) presented a methodology for applying canonical trans-
        formation when all effects in the model affect all traits but there are missing traits for
        some animals. The principles of the methodology are briefly discussed and illustrated
        by an example.
            Let y, the vector of observations, be partitioned as y′ = [y , y ] and u = [b′, a′],
                                                              v  m
        where y  and y  are vectors of observed and missing records, respectively, b is the
               v      m
        vector of fixed effects and a is the vector of random effects. Assuming that the distri-
        bution of y given u is multivariate normal, Ducrocq and Besbes (1993) showed that
        the following expectation maximization (EM) algorithm gives the same solutions for
        a and b as when the usual multivariate MME are solved:

            E step: at iteration k, calculate y  = E[y|y , uˆ ]
                                                   [k]
                                        [k]
                                       ˆ
                                                v
            M step: calculate u ˆ  [k+1]  = BLUE and BLUP solutions of b and a, respectively,
            given y ˆ  [k]
        The E step implies doing nothing to observed records but replacing the missing obser-
        vations by their expectation given the current solutions for b and a, and the observed
        records. The equation for the missing records for animal i is:
             [k]
                     [k]
            y  = x ′  b  + aˆ  [k]  + e ˆ [k]                                 (e.1)
            ˆ
             im   im      im   im
        If X is the matrix that relates fixed effects to animals, x′  denotes the row of X
                                                            im
        corresponding to missing records for animal  i and  e ˆ  [k]  is the regression of the
                                                        im
        residuals of missing records on the current estimates of the residuals for observed
        traits. Thus:
                                       −1
                             [k]
                                                 [k]
                                                      [k]
             [k]
            e  = E[e |y , u = uˆ ] = R  R [y  − x′ b  − a ]
                                                     ˆ
            ˆ
             im     im  iv         mv  vv  iv  iv     iv
        where R  and  R  are submatrices obtained through partitioning of  R, the
                mv       vv
        residual covariance matrix.  R  represents the residual variance of observed
                                     vv
        traits and R  is the covariance between missing traits and observed traits. If
                    mv
        three traits are considered, for example, and trait 2 is missing for animal i, then
        R  is the submatrix obtained by selecting in R the elements at intersection of
          vv
        rows 1 and 3 and columns 1 and 3. The submatrix R  is the element at the
                                                            mv
        intersection of row 2 and columns 1 and 3. Once the missing observations have
        been estimated, records are now available on all animals and the analysis can be
        carried out as usual, applying canonical transformation as when all records are
        observed.
            The application of the method in genetic evaluation involves the following steps
        at each iteration k, assuming Q is the transformation matrix to canonical scale and
        Q  the back-transforming matrix:
          −1
        Appendix E                                                           319
   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340