Page 378 - Feline diagnostic imaging
P. 378

23.5  ­epatic Ultrasound  387
               23.4   Contrast Radiography:
               Portography

               Portosystemic shunts are congenital or acquired anomalies
               with an abnormal communication between the portal and
               systemic venous systems. The anomalous shunting vessel
               diverts  portal  blood  into  a  systemic  vein  (caudal  vena
               cava, azygous vein most commonly), bypassing the liver.
               Extrahepatic  shunts,  typically  left  gastric  vein  to  caudal
               vena cava, are the most common congenital shunts in the
               cat  [9,12,25–28].  Congenital  intrahepatic  shunts  are  less
               common, with left divisional (patent ductus venosus) seen
               most frequently [9,12,25–28]. Various imaging techniques
               have  been  used  to  demonstrate  the  anomalous  vessels,
               including  cranial  mesenteric  portography,  percutaneous
               splenoportography, and operative mesenteric portography
               [10–12,25,28–31].                                  Figure 23.10  Longitudinal ultrasound image of the left liver
                 Angiography of the portal vein provides visualization of   in a normal cat. The hepatic parenchyma has a medium level
               the anomalous vessel, any acquired collateral vessels, the   echogenicity, with a slightly coarse texture. It should be uniform
               direction of portal blood flow, and the patency of the portal   in appearance, only broken up by hepatic vessels and
                                                                  gallbladder.
               vein and its branches. Computed tomography (CT) angiog-
               raphy has replaced intraoperative contrast injection in most
               patients [32,33]. Fast scan times, good spatial, contrast, and   (Figure 23.10). The normal echogenicity of the liver is iso-
               temporal resolution, and the ability to create multiplanar   echoic to slightly hyperechoic or hypoechoic to the renal
               and three‐dimensional images allow excellent  visualization   cortex (comparing caudate liver lobe to cranial pole of right
               of  anomalous  vessels,  with  more  exact  determination  of   kidney). However, because cats can deposit large amounts
               origin and termination locations [34]. CT angiography can   of fat in the renal cortex, the echogenicity of the kidney can
               be performed via a peripheral venous injection, and is thus   be greater than that of the liver in normal cats [40]. In most
               less invasive than mesenteric portography. Timing of the   cats, the hepatic parenchyma is hypoechoic to adjacent fal-
               contrast injection and subsequent scanning runs is impor-  ciform fat (Figure 23.11). However, normal obese cats can
               tant in order to image the hepatic and portal vasculature at   deposit  large  amounts  of  fat  in  the  liver  parenchyma,
               the time of maximum contrast opacification [33–39].  resulting in a more echogenic appearance without specific
                                                                  pathology [41–43]. These variations should be taken into
                                                                  account before assigning significance to changes in hepatic
                                                                  parenchymal  echogenicity,  and  mild  changes  should  be
               23.5   Hepatic Ultrasound                          viewed with caution.
                                                                   The liver margins should be smooth and sharp but are
               Ultrasound examination of the liver allows more detailed   better  visualized  if  adjacent  peritoneal  fluid  is  present.
               evaluation of hepatic internal architecture, including the   Differentiation of individual liver lobes is also better evalu-
               hepatic vasculature and biliary system. Ultrasound is also   ated in the presence of effusion. The liver is bordered crani-
               useful  in  guiding  aspirates  and  biopsies  for  nonsurgical,   ally  and  dorsally  by  an  echogenic  line  representing  the
               less invasive diagnoses.                           interface  between  the  diaphragm  and  lung/pleural  mar-
                 The liver can be well visualized using a subxiphoid win-  gins (Figure 23.12). A mirror‐image artifact is frequently
               dow. Intercostal windows are not typically needed in the   noted deep to the diaphragmatic interface, giving the false
               cat  but  can  be  used  to  provide  additional  images  of  the   impression of liver on both sides of the diaphragm.
               porta hepatis. The selection of transducer and frequency   The ultrasound assessment of hepatic size is subjective
               for hepatic evaluation depends on patient size and size of   and based on operator experience. A small liver is more dif-
               the liver. Because of the smaller overall body size, a higher   ficult  to  evaluate  sonographically  because  of  cranial  dis-
               frequency probe can be used (8–12 MHz) in most cats.  placement of the stomach, limiting the imaging window.
                 The hepatic parenchyma has a medium‐level echogenic-  The  enlarged  liver  results  in  increased  distance  between
               ity,  with  a  homogeneous  and  uniform  texture  that  is   the diaphragm and stomach, and can be examined easily
               somewhat coarser and typically hypoechoic to the spleen   with  ultrasound  as  it  extends  well  beyond  the  xiphoid
   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383