Page 65 - MODUL

menulisnya…‖. L3 argued that the role of lecturer as an information provider help
students to finish their writing tasks. Therefore, researcher enacted lecturer‘s role

as an information provider in implementing the IBLL model in writing classes.
The four lecturers‘ role of IBLL model abovementioned was taken based

on the needs analysis of learning needs. The data of ranking of lecturers‘ role are

presented as Table 17 as follows.
Table 17. Needs Analysis of Lecturers’ Roles in Writing Classes

Rank Lecturers‘ role in the Percentage
writing class Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
I Assessor 68.75 28.12 3.12 0
II Feedback Giver 65.62 28.12 6.25 0
III Facilitator 65.62 34.37 0 0
IV Information Provider 62.5 34.37 3.12 0
V Controller 50 46.87 3.12 0
VI Collaborator 40.62 53.12 3.12 3.12
VII Organizer 31.25 59.37 9.37 0

The data of Table 17 showed that the lecturers‘ roles as assessor, feedback

giver, facilitator, and information provider was appropriate role (in strongly agree)
in developing the IBLL model. The last three lecturers‘ role was inserted in some

roles in practice. For instance, the lecturer‘s role as an organizer and controller

was adapted in as a facilitator. Meanwhile, as collaborator, the lecturer modified
this role in practice into the feedback giver.

The lecturers‘ roles in teaching writings were validated by observers
during the classroom. The observers assessed the lecturers‘ performance in classes

when they performed their roles. Based on the observers‘ assessment, the roles of
lecturers in writing class were categorized as appropriate roles. The result of

observers‘ assessment can be seen in Table 18 as follows.

Table 18. Lecturer’s Performance in Writing Classes
Percentage of Performance (%)
No Meeting Mean Criteria
Observer 1 Observer 2
1 I 81 81 81 Very Good
2 II 88 94 91 Very Good
3 III 94 94 94 Very Good
4 IV 75 75 75 Very Good
5 V 88 88 88 Very Good
6 VI 94 94 94 Very Good
Mean % 87 88 87 Very Good

61