Page 60 - EALC C306/505
P. 60

52



                                                    Grammar and Notes

                   6.1 Sentence adjuncts and topics

                   The following sentence is grammatically complex:

                                               君安驪姬,是我傷公之心也.

                   The sentence must be understood as a response to Chóngĕr’s suggestion. The first four
                   characters here serve as a “sentence adjunct.” This means that they “set the stage” for the
                   sentence, but do not further engage in the syntax. The word shì 是: “[in] this [manner],”
                   which in this context means following Chóngĕr’s suggestion, is the topic of the sentence.
                   Thus the sentence may be analyzed as follows:

                          Context: The duke loves Lí Ji
                          Topic: Acting as you [Chóngĕr] have suggested
                          Comment on the topic: I shall [thus] break the duke’s heart

                   There are other ways to analyze the sentence, but this analysis should serve to highlight
                   the way in which sentences sometimes seem more a series of phrases governed by colons
                   than a syntactically coherent utterance. Compare ordinary English with a literal rendering
                   of the WYW:

                          Because the duke loves Lí Ji, if I act as you suggest, I shall break the
                          duke’s heart.

                          [Given] the duke loves Lí Ji: [as for acting] thus: I shall break the duke’s
                          heart.

                   6.2 The adjunct rán 然

                   Rán 然 (“this being so”) frequently serves as a sentence adjunct. Following a statement,
                   its consequential aspects may be preceded by the adjunct 然, which “resumes” the entire
                   preceding statement or discussion in a single word, thus highlighting that what is about to
                   follow is precisely the consequence of what has been discussed before.

                   As a sentence adjunct, 然 is generally followed by zé 則. There are two ways to analyze
                   the function of 則 and they are about equally persuasive. The first is to treat 則 as
                   marking a hypothetical clause. In that case, sentences that begin with 然則 may be
                   thought of as starting, “If this be so, then . . . .” However, 則 is sometimes better
                   explained as a weak marker of logical or action progression (as in the general, “once this
                   is so, then . . .” or the specific instance, “once this was so, then . . .”). This use of 則 may
                   often be rendered by something like, “well, then . . .” carrying a force close to “well,
                   naturally . . .” Therefore, it may sometimes be more appropriate to think of 然則 as
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65