Page 43 - Atlas of Creation Volume 2

Harun Yahya

any fruit, by saying that "Evolutionary constraint can't explain the persistence of all the living fossils." The
magazine then went on to say:

All this leaves a rather complicated picture . . . Be general, or specialised. Live fast, or slow. Keep it simple, or
don't. Be in the right place at the right time. If all else fails, try becoming a "superspecies", blessed with a phys-
iology that can withstand anything. 13

To put it another way, Darwinists are ready to ascribe the existence of living fossils to any cause apart from
the fact of Creation. If all their explanations fail to hold water, they will then regard a particular organism as a
"superspecies," as is clearly stated by New Scientist. The only thing that may not be done, in Darwinist eyes, is

to admit that the life form in question was originally "created."
These inconsistent claims—which Darwin hid behind and that present-day Darwinists generally avoid
mentioning—have been totally demolished in the face of the extraordinarily large numbers of fossils exhibit-
ing stasis. There are more "living fossils" than evolutionists can dream up scenarios for, and they clearly indi-
cate that evolution never took place.
According to evolutionary theory, an animal resembling a modern-day wolf entered the sea one day, and

within 50 million years, its descendants turned into a gigantic marine mammal as the whale. If, despite its ev-
14
ident illogicality, evolution is able to turn a land mammal into a whale in such a relatively brief space of geo-
logic time, how could the salamander remain unchanged for 160 million years? No evolutionist has any
scientific answer to that question.

Adnan Oktar 41