Page 30 - GS_Journal_2016_back2back with agenda cover
P. 30

UCU GS Research Journal
            INSTITUTIONAL LEADERSHIP PRACTICES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION
                                   OF K TO 12 PROGRAM
                                  JONALYN S. MARCOLINO












                This study determined the level of institutional leadership practices in the implementation
        of the K to 12 program of central school principals in the different divisions of Region I, SY
        2015-2016  and  specifically,  it  determined  the  following:  profile  of  the  respondents  in  terms
        of educational qualifications, length of service as school principal, relevant trainings, number
        of  teachers  supervised  and  attitudes  towards  educational  innovations;  level  of  institutional
        leadership practices in the different aspects of K to 12 namely: learning environment, curriculum
        and instructional development, professional development, teachers assessment, monitoring and
        assessment of students performance, use of multimedia and external stakeholders collaboration;
        significant  difference  in  the  level  of  institutional  leadership  practices  and  profile  variables;
        significant  relationship  of  the  level  of  institutional  leadership  competence  and  the  profile
        variables; and a proposed intervention practices.
                The findings are as follows: Majority are Master of Arts degree holder, attended in-service
        trainings from district to international level, supervised 21-40 and have different attitudes along
        educational innovations. Their level of institutional leadership practices have an overall average
        weighted mean of 4.63 equivalent to very satisfactory. There is no significant difference in the
        level of school principals institutional leadership in the implementation of the K to 12 program
        across the profile variables except in the district level in-service trainings. There is no significant
        relationship between the level of institutional leadership practices and the aforementioned profile
        variable. The problems encountered are “slightly serious.”
                Furthermore,  the  researcher  arrived  at  the  following  conclusions:  Majority  have
        adequate educational qualifications and with positive attitude towards educational innovations
        thereby making them effective in the implementation of their institutional leadership practices in
        the K to 12 program. The problems encountered are similar problems encountered by any school
        administrators and the proposed intervention practices may be used by them.
                The recommendations are: All school principals must be motivated and encourage to
        finish their Doctoral and Masteral degrees to upgrade themselves professionally. They must always
        aspire to be excellent in performing their functions and responsibilities in the implementation of
        the K to 12 program. More variables should be explored to predict higher level of institutional
        leadership practices by other principals not included in this study. The proposed intervention
        practices should be implemented to minimize problems in the implementation of the program.
        They should maintain the very satisfactory level of institutional leadership practices at all times
        even  though  their  profiles  vary.  Further  studies  should  be  conducted  in  a  wider  perspective
        including monitoring and evaluation.
                                             22
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35