Page 32 - GS_Journal_2015
P. 32

GS Research Journal

             derived:  Aside  from  the  curricular  offerings  which  involve  Speech  subjects,  Grammar  and
             Literature, the students should have more speech laboratory training. The social media- Face
             book, blogs and tweet as communication mediums should be maximized to encourage students to
             use English. Drama presentations and collaborative English Language should be used to enhance
             and enrich language activities of the students.  Chatting in the internet using the English should
             be encouraged. Teachers of English should include in their course requirements the submission
             of book reports, magazine article reviews and news reviews to enhance the English Proficiency.
             Further, other strategies in the use of the English language should be conducted.


                        LEARNING DIFFICULTIES IN SCIENCE IV (PHYSICS)
                                    FLOR JASMIN M. DOMANTAY


                    This study determined the levels of learning difficulty of 80 fourth year high school
             students in Physics. Specifically, problem No. 1 dealt with the profile variables, namely: a) sex, b)
             GPA in the second grading period, c) monthly family income, d) highest educational attainment
             of fathers, e) highest educational attainment of mothers, f) occupation of parents, g) learning
             practices  (note  taking,  doing  assignment,  participation  during  class  discussion,  h)  teachers’
             influence (personality, teaching methodology, evaluation/feedback), i)school learning facilities
             (classroom, laboratory, library. Problem No. 2 determined the levels of test performance of the
             respondent-students in Science IV (Physics).  Problem No. 3 determined the levels of learning
             difficulty of the respondents in the different cognitive areas, namely: knowledge, comprehension,
             application, evaluation, analysis, and synthesis. Problem No. 4 determined whether or not there
             significant  differences  in  the  levels  of  difficulty  of  the  respondents  in  Science  IV  (Physics).
             Finally,   Problem No. 5 determined whether or not there are significant relationships between
             the levels of learning difficulty of the respondents in Science IV (Physics).
             The following are the salient findings of this study: There are more male than females among
             the respondent-students, majority had GPA with the 75-79 brackets, belong to families whose
             monthly family income is 5,000 Php and below, whose fathers and mothers are high school
             graduates, and employed in menial jobs. Most of the students have moderately positive attitude
             towards learning, generally, the respondent-students test performance in Science IV (Physics)
             is only average. The levels of difficulty of the respondent-students in Science IV (Physics) in the
             in Knowledge are 0.4083 (difficult), Comprehension is 0.3768 (difficult), Application is 0.4125
             (moderately difficult), Evaluation is 0.6938 (not difficult), Analysis is 0.2625 (very difficult) and
             Synthesis is 0.2094 (very difficult). There are no significant differences in the levels of learning
             difficulty of the respondent-students across the profile variables.
             The following are the conclusions drawn in this study: The respondent-students are typical high
             school students in a national high school, situated in a semi-rural area; they vary a bit across
             the variable categories, but tended to concentrate around the categories  with lower values.
             The differences of the performance of the respondent-student in this study are extreme. Thus,

                                                                                     20
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37