Page 38 - GS_Journal_2015
P. 38

GS Research Journal

             further improvement; (3) Easy and difficult items not only moderate should also be included; (4)
             More learning materials on the least learned items should be included; (5) Learning materials
             produced and developed should be used.


             STRATEGIES AND METHODS IN TEACHING READING IN MOTHER TONGUE
                                        NESCIE C. GONZALES


                    This study determined the level of instructional management practices of teachers in
             the Mother Tongue of Asingan Districts I and II SY 2014-2015. Specifically, this study sought to
             determined the following: 1) profile of Grade II teachers teaching Mother Tongue, in terms of age,
             sex, civil status, highest educational attainment, number of years teaching Grade 2, language
             spoken at home and relevant trainings attended; 2) level of instructional management practices;
             3) problems encountered and coping mechanisms used; 4) significant difference in the levels of
             instructional management practices across the profile variables; 5) significant relationship of the
             levels of instructional management practices and the selected profile variables.
                    The descriptive method was used in this study. Profiles were determined using the
             frequency  counts  and  percentages.  The  following  are  the  salient  findings:  Majority  of  the
             respondents are old who belong to the age bracket 36 years old and above, married, 2 years
             number of years teaching Grade 2, have MA units, Ilokoas used as Mother Tongue at home
             and attended relevant trainings. On the level of instructional management practices the overall
             weighted  mean  with  its  corresponding  descriptive  equivalent:  planning  4.06  “practiced”,
             organizing 4.13 “practiced”, controlling 4.11 “practiced”, directing 4.16 “practiced”, coordinating
             4.16  “practiced”  coordinating  4.16  “practiced”  and  evaluating  4.42  “practiced”.  The  overall
             weighted mean is 4.17 practiced. On the problems encountered the overall weighted men is
             3.44  “moderately  serious”.  The  coping  mechanisms  have  an  overall  weighted  mean  of  3.17
             “sometimes”.  There  is  no  significant  differences  on  the  level  of  instructional  management
             practices and the profile variables except in planning, evaluating, directing, evaluating. There
             are no significant relationship between the level of instructional management practices of the
             respondents and the selected profile variables, highest educational attainment, number of years
             teaching Grade 2, language spoken at home and relevant trainings. The problem encountered
             has an overall weighted mean of 3.44 “moderately serious” and the coping mechanisms are 3.17
             “sometimes”.
                    In the light of the findings, the following conclusions were drawn The teachers are
             educationally  qualified,  had  been  teaching  Grade  2  for  several  years.  The  most  extensively
             used instructional management practices with the highest weighted mean are on evaluating.
             Problems encountered are minimal, for they are believed to be flexible in adjusting to different
             situations and coping positively with challenges as their coping mechanisms.
                    Based  on  the  findings’  and  conclusions  drawn,  the  following  recommendations  are
             forwarded. Since the level of instructional management practices is only “practiced” and needs

                                                                                     26
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43