Page 558 - Microsoft Word - Belicena respaldo

The meditation of all these allowed me to comprehend that the «interrogation» is an
attitude intrinsically rational; it means, that it is only possible to interrogate from that
ordination that we call reason. Of all the existent creatures only the man interrogates and he
makes it to know, to obtain knowledge.

Expression of his miserable ineptness and the drama of his ignorance, the interrogation,
starting from the reason, the logic, permits him to emit inferences, propositions, and make
judgements. But the knowledge obtained exclusively from the reason, by the interrogationto
the reality of the world, entails a –violence and rebellion. The interrogation carries implicit the
possibility of an answer and this implication there is something superb and arrogant.

Interrogates who proudly «knows» that will be satiated on its knowledge. This rebellion,
this pride, the arrogance, al last, this violence that lies behind in the interrogation is, of course,
totally useless, every time that it doesn’t facilitate the liberation of man from his
incarceration to the illusory forms of the matter.

The moral error of the interrogation as «means to know» is evidentiated in all its absurd
contradiction when man affirms the «right» to ask, it means when he establishes that it is
juridical and morally licit and even advisable to practice the interrogation, absurd possibility
that guides inevitably to the nagation of God (atheism), to confess the impossibility of this
question (agnosticism) or the most perturbing hyphotesis which are just that, probable
answers but not real answers.

The Gnosis, philosophical current that Belicena Villca referred enough, affirmed the
possibility to be «saved» by means of the knowledge (gnosis), but this «knowledge» must not be
obtained in a rational manner. As Serge Hutin said: «The gnosis, possession of the Initiates, is
opposed to the vulgar pistis (belief) of the simply faithfuls. It is less a ‘knowledge’ than a secret
and mysterious revelation». «… The gnosis constitutes once it has been reached, a total
knowledge, immediate¸ that the individual possesses enterly or lacks at all; is the ‘knowledge’
itself, absolute, that includes Man, the Cosmos and the Divinity. And is just through this

knowledge –and not through the faith or actions– that an individual can be saved».

Exists then another way to «know» and, even if an obscurantist conspiracy has erased
the Gnosis and its Initiatic Wisdom from the Official History, was in the «gnostic» way that I
found the solution to communicate with the Voice.

Is that effectively there is a form to obtain knowledge «beyond» the reason, without
falling into the mechanic of the question and answer, of the comparison and the conclusion, of
the analysis and the synthesis, at last, of the dialectis. And it is extremely simple. Consists to

558