Page 66 - ver3

Additionally, in certain courses, the completed research proposal and final research report are

evaluated for plagiarism and resemblance using the Safe Assign tool via the Rafid e-learning

platform (Annex S2-3-6-6), (Annex S2-3-6-7) and https://help.blackboard.com/ar-sa/SafeAssign.
Moreover, the teaching staff checks their research for pilgrims before submitting for journal

publications via private pilgrims check software. So, they can random check student works using

their own software (Annex S2-3-6-8).

Overall Evaluation for Quality of the Standard:

Strengths:

Generally, the program is well integrated with the institution in a way that contributes to the
institution's overall mission and goals. This integration has been considered throughout the

planning and development of the program. In terms of the curriculum, the program meets the

required standards of the country and fulfills its stated objectives. The curriculum has been well

planned, cohesively designed, appropriately sequenced and delivered. It covers the major areas of
teaching and learning that are crucial to the profession - both for initial preparation and for later

professional development, in particular:

• The program adheres well to institutional policies, standards and procedures in

curriculum design and development.

• Graduate attributes and learning outcomes comply perfectly with academic and
professional requirements

• Curriculum design takes into account the achievement of program objectives, learning

outcomes, and educational, scientific, technical, and professional developments in the

field of specialization.
• The study plan ensures a balance between general and specialized requirements, and

between theoretical and applied aspects; it takes into account the sequence and

complementarity of the courses.

• Teaching and learning strategies and assessment methods are aligned with the
intended learning outcomes at the program and course level.

• Teaching and learning strategies focus on the student, but they differ in terms of

teaching, learning and assessment methods in the program according to its nature and

66