Page 157 - BUKU SYNOPSIS

Table 15. The summary of rubric-based peer-assessment sheets review

No. Aspects Description V

Peer-assessment descriptions are created to
1 correspond with learning objectives and
achievement. 0.75
Peer-assessment descriptors were composed
2 Content following the essay argumentative assessment
rubric. 0.75
Peer-assessment descriptions are created and
3 organized systematically based on the
argumentative essay criteria. 0.83
Peer-assessments was developed clearly and
4
understood well by students/test takers 0.92
Each expression was constructed using English
5
pattern 0.83
Using simple language that test takers/students
6
can understand. 0.92
7 The expressions presented have no dual meanings. 0.83
The language used corresponded to the student's
8
Language use
language proficiency. 1.00
Statements are spelled according to the English
9
language. 1.00
10 Font, letter type, and letter size 1.00
The appearance of the peer-assessment format was
11 Writing clear/not confusing. 1.00
technique
12 The space between words is neither too close nor
too far apart. 1.00
The peer-assessment form is simple to use for
13
evaluating/reviewing. 0.83
14 Assisting students in performing peer-assessment. 0.83
Usefulness Assisting in establishing the level of written
15
proficiency attained by students. 1.00
16 Assisting in predicting passing standards. 1.00
17 As a form of learning feedback. 1.00

Table 15 illustrates that there are three items classified as having

medium validity, which necessitate improvement prior to implementation.

152