Page 168 - BUKU SYNOPSIS

The revised model design was then resubmitted to the validators for

verification of its conformity to their recommendations. If the revision did not

meet the intentions given by the validators, the researcher revised it until it

was in accordance with the recommendations provided by the validators.

Field testing ensures that all instruments employed are clear and can be

understood by students, instructors, and raters throughout instrument

operation. Several modifications had been made to the misspellings across

the documents. However, because all of the writing parts of the analytic

scoring rubric met the criteria of item fit based on the many-facet Rasch

Measurement, no adjustments were made to the writing test’s construct.

6. Interpreting Students’ Writing Achievement

A score will be generated from assessing student writing scripts against the

analytical scoring criteria. These findings must be appropriately interpreted as

the foundation for improved learning. The researcher employed evaluation

procedures in higher education based on national education standards to

investigate if the learning process influences student learning outcomes. The

assessment scores range from 1 to 100. Because the assessment rubric is built

with an assessment weight for each element of writing whose final result is

100, student score values do not need to be converted based on this interval.

The minimal passing score is 56 which equals C.

163