Page 14 - IOSH JanFeb24_Full LR
P. 14

HOSPITALITY


               New company owners exempt

        THE KNOWLEDGE  PROSECUTIONS
               from paying £140k fine over


               fatal fall at Silverstone





               A judge has ruled that the new owners
               of a company that provided temporary
               accommodation in the run-up to the
               2016 British Grand Prix are discharged

               from paying the £140,000 fine that
               was imposed on the business in a
               subsequent criminal case.

               THE CRIMINAL CASE
               The GB Health and Safety Executive
               (HSE) had brought the prosecution
               after its investigation found that
               Snoozebox’s previous owners had
               failed to manage work on a barn
               roof safely at the site in Silverstone,
                                                      A contractor fell from a barn roof
               Northamptonshire, in August 2016.     on the Silverstone motor-racing site
               A contractor had fallen through a
               4.6m tall barn roof and died from
               his injuries.                      schedule of repayments to the creditors.  JUDGE’S COMMENTS
                 To save costs, one of the directors   However, that did not happen in   Judge Rebecca Crane said there was a
               turned down a £5000 quote from     this case. As Chris MacQueen, director   failure to carry out even the most basic
               another contractor and hired someone   at Cardium Law, explained to IOSH   checks to ensure that either no work at
               he had previously worked with who   magazine, the main creditor, SQN Asset   height was being carried out or, if it was,
               quoted £200, the court was told. He   Finance Income Fund, agreed to ‘give   that the appropriate safety procedures
               did not ask to see any documentation   up’ its secured rights and any rights   were in place. She also told the court that
               to demonstrate his competence,     to dividends in exchange for taking   text messages showed a ‘clear desire’ to
               experience and expertise to safely   ownership of the company.        keep costs low. One of the texts asked the
               complete the work required.          ‘This meant that all of the unsecured   contractor to wear personal protective
                                                  creditors got more than 90p in the pound   equipment, indicating an obvious lack
               THE CIVIL CASE                     rather than nothing,’ he said. ‘SQN then   of preparedness.
               Following the fatality, Snoozebox’s   subsequently sold the company to its new   However, Judge Crane agreed that

               previous owners faced insolvency   owners – and that is how they got some   any fines levied by the criminal court in
               and abandoned the barn adaptation.   return on their secured debt.’   relation to the fatality could not be enforced
               When liquidators came in, they       This change of ownership took place as   because the CVA process discharged all the
               recommended a creditors’ voluntary   the HSE investigation into the fatality was   company’s liabilities.  PHOTOGRAPHY: HSE / GETTY / SHUTTERSTOCK
               agreement (CVA).                   ongoing and its subsequent prosecution
                 When a CVA takes place, the      was delayed in part because of the     Get more detail in our online story:
               insolvent company typically agrees a   COVID-19 lockdown.                 ioshmagazine.com/snoozebox

             14  JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2024  |  IOSHMAGAZINE.COM



         14-17 Prosecutions_Jan-Feb 2024_IOSH.indd   14                                                            12/12/2023   09:29
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19