Page 92 - Q - 9 - 2

√«¡º≈ß“π∑“ß«‘™“°“√¢Õß»“ μ√“®“√¬å®‘μμ‘ μ‘ß»¿—∑‘¬å 61

°ÆÀ¡“¬·æà߇¬Õ√¡—π ‡√“®÷ß√—∫À≈—°°“√π’È¡“¥â«¬μ“¡À≈—° Damnum Sine Injuria π’È

§«“¡√—∫º‘¥∑“ß≈–‡¡‘¥¡’¢Õ∫‡¢μ∑’Ë®”°—¥¡“° ·≈–¡’‡ß◊ËÕπ‰¢∑’Ë ”§—≠¥—ßπ’È.-

Ò. º≈ª√–‚¬™πå∑’Ë∂Ÿ°∑”„À⇠’¬À“¬π—ÈπμâÕ߇ªìπº≈ª√–‚¬™πå∑’Ë°ÆÀ¡“¬≈–‡¡‘¥

„À⧫“¡§ÿ⡧√Õß ‡√’¬°«à“ çProtectable Interestsé „π¡“μ√“ ¯ÚÛ (I) ¢Õ߇¬Õ√¡—π
·≈–¡“μ√“ ÙÚ ¢Õ߉∑¬π—Èπ ‡√“®–‡ÀÁπ‰¥â«à“‰¥â¡’°“√√–∫ÿ«à“º≈ª√–‚¬™πåμàÕ‰ªπ’È

°ÆÀ¡“¬≈–‡¡‘¥®–„À⧫“¡§ÿ⡧√Õß °≈à“«§◊Õ.

ç™’«‘μ √à“ß°“¬ Õπ“¡—¬ ‡ √’¿“æ ∑√—æ¬å ‘π À√◊Õ ‘∑∏‘Õ¬à“ßÀπ÷ËßÕ¬à“ß„¥°Á¥’é

º≈ª√–‚¬™πå‡À≈à“π’È ‡√’¬°«à“ Protected Interests ·μà„π∫“ߪ√–‡∑»
‡¢“®–æ‘®“√≥“‡√◊ËÕßπ’ȉª„π∑”πÕß∑’Ë«à“®”‡≈¬¡’Àπâ“∑’ËμàÕ‚®∑°åå∑’Ë®–μâÕß√–«—߇√’¬°«à“

The concept of duty of care §◊ÕμâÕßæ‘ Ÿ®πå«à“¡’ duty of care ‡ ’¬°àÕπ

Ú. °“√°√–∑”¢Õß®”‡≈¬ ·≈–§«“¡‡ ’¬À“¬∑’ˇ°‘¥¢÷Èπ®–μâÕß¡’º≈μàÕ‡π◊ËÕß°—π

æÕ‡æ’¬ß À≈—°„π‡√◊ËÕßπ’È ‡√’¬°«à“ adequate cause theory §‘¥§âπ‚¥¬ Von Kries „π
(ÙÛ)
ª≈“¬»μ«√√…∑’Ë Ò˘ ·μà‡¥‘¡„π Lex Aqulia „π°ÆÀ¡“¬‚√¡—ππ—Èπ‡√◊ËÕ߇Àμÿ°—∫º≈π’È
‡¢“摇§√“–Àå‚¥¬„™â∑ƒ…Æ’º≈‚¥¬μ√ß (the direct conseqnence theory) ∑ƒ…Æ’

adequate cause ¢Õß Von Kries ¡’≈—°…≥–§≈⓬°—∫∑ƒ…Æ’‡≈Á߇ÀÁπº≈ (Reasonable
Forseeability) ∑’Ë„™â„π§Õ¡¡Õπ≈Õ«å

Û. §«“¡‡ ’¬À“¬∑’ˇ∫“∫“ß¡“° (Trivial damage) ®–‡√’¬°√âÕß°—π‰¡à‰¥â

Ù. §«“¡‡ ’¬À“¬∑’Ë®”‡≈¬®–μâÕß√—∫º‘¥®–μâÕ߇ªì𧫓¡‡ ’¬À“¬μàÕº≈ª√–‚¬™πå

¢Õß¡À“™π¥â«¬ (Public Interest) ‡æ√“–≈–‡¡‘¥‰¡à„™à‡ªìπ‡√◊ËÕ߇°’ˬ«°—∫°“√™¥„™â
§à“‡ ’¬À“¬„Àâ‡Õ°™π·μà‡æ’¬ßÕ¬à“߇¥’¬« ·μà‡ªìπ‡√◊ËÕ߇°’ˬ«°—∫§«“¡ ß∫‡√’¬∫√âÕ¬Õ’°

ª√–°“√Àπ÷Ëß ‡æ√“–©–π—Èπ·¡â«à“„π∫“ß°√≥’ ‚®∑°åå®–‰¥â√—∫§«“¡‡ ’¬À“¬®“°°“√°√–∑”

¢Õß®”‡≈¬ ·μà∂â“À“°°“√°√–∑”π—Èπ‡ªìπª√–‚¬™πåμàÕ¡À“™π·≈â« °“√°√–∑”¢Õß®”‡≈¬
°Á‰¡à‡ªìπ°“√°√–∑”∑’Ë®–μâÕß√—∫º‘¥®÷ß¡’°“√∫—≠≠—쑇ªìπ∫∑π‘√‚∑…°√√¡¥—ßμ—«Õ¬à“ß„π

¡“μ√“ Ùı

(ÙÛ)
H.LA. HART AND A.M. HONORE, CAUSATION IN THE LAW, (Oxford,
Clarendon) part III .