Page 273 - Chayei Adam LAYOUT sivan 5782

םדא הכוס יניד “ ו - מק ללכ ייח

ר ָּּת ֻמ ןֵכ ְּו .א ָּמְּלָּע יֵּ לֻכְּל ר ָּּת ֻמ הֶז ,םי ִדּו ּמַע ָּה ם ֶהָּּב קיִז ֲח ַּמ ֶ ׁש אָּּ ל ֶא תֹור ְּמ ְּס ַּמ ַה לַע
ְּ
ּ
ּ
ֹומ ְּצַע ךָּכ ְּּס ַה רֹ ׁש ְּקִל לָּבֲא .ם יִיּול ְּב ם י ִדָּג ְּב ִב ֹוא ן ָּּת ְּ ׁש ִּפ ל ֶ ׁש ם יִלָּבֲחַּב ם ָּר ְּ ׁש ָּקְּל
ְּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
רָּב ָּד ְּב ֹומ ְּצַע ךָּכ ְּּס ַה ר ֵ ׁשֹו ּ ק ֶ ׁש ןָּויֵּכ ,הָּּ ל ִח ְּתַכְּל ר ֵהָּזִל יּוא ָּר ,םיִלָּבֲחַּב תֹואָּסְּנֹול ְּכ ִב
138 :ה ָּא ְּמ ֻט לֵּב ַק ְּמ ַה

ׁשֵי ,'ד בחר ן ֵה ְּו ד ַחַי םי ִרָּּב ֻח ְּמּו םי ִּ ק ַד םי ִצ ֵע ֵמ תוגירס ןי ִשֹוע ֶ ׁש ן ָּתֹוא ]אל[
ּ
ּ
ּ
ֹ
ּ
ּ
י ִּפ לַע ףאו ַ ְּ 139 .לּוסָּפ ְּד םי ִחָּפ ְּט 'ד ב ַחר ֹו ּב ׁשֵּי ֶ ׁש ר ֶסֶנ ְּכ ןָּני ִד ְּד ר ָּ ׁש ְּפ ֶא ְּד ,קֵּפ ַּת ְּס ִהְּל
ְּ
ןיִגֲהֹוּנ ַה ְּב תֹוח ְּמִל ןי ֵא םֹוק ָּמ לָּּכמ ִ 141 .רסֱאֶל ׁשֵּי ֶ ׁש ר ָּ ׁש ְּפ ֶא ,ר ֵ ׁשָּּכ ךָּכ ְּס ויָּלָּע ן ֵתֹוּנ ֶ ׁש
ֹ
ּ
ְּ
ְּ
141 :ה ָּר ְּק ִת ת ַרֵזְּּג ךָּּי ַ ׁש אל ,ר ֵ ׁשָּּכ ךָּכ ְּס ויָּלָּע ן ֵתֹוּנ ֶ ׁש ןָּויֵּכ ,ר ֵּת ֶה
ֹ
ּ
ְּ
ּ
ּ
ך ַמָּּס ֶ ׁש ֹוא /\ הֶזָּּכ ֹוזָּּב ֹוז תֹוקּוב ְּד תֹונָּפ ְּד ַה י ֵ ׁשא ָּר ּוי ָּה ֶ ׁש ןֹוג ְּכ גַּג ּהָּל ןי ֵא ֶ ׁש הָּּכס ֻ ]בל[
ּ
ְּ
ֹ
ֹ
ֹ
ֹ
ֹ
ׁשֵי ם ִא םֹוק ָּמ לָּּכ ִמּו .ןֶפּד אל ְּו ךָּכ ְּס אל ןאָּּכ ןי ֵא ֶ ׁש ,הָּלּוספ ְּּ |\ הֶזָּּכ ל ֶתֹ ּכַל ןֶפּד ַה ׁשאר
ְּ
ּ
ֹ
ּ
אל ,ּוני ֵתֹוני ִד ְּמ ִב יּוצ ָּמ ֹוני ֵא ֶ ׁש י ִפלּו ְּ 1 4 3 .ה ָּר ֵ ׁש ְּכ ,חַפ ֶט ּהָּּגַגְּל ךּומָּס 'ּג ִמ תֹוחָּפ ְּב
ּ
םדו רשב
were typically used for roofs of houses are according to R’ Eliezer, a succah which forms
included in the ban. (Ritva ) the shape of a teepee is not valid. The same is
כק
true if he merely leans the s’chach against the
140. Certainly, if the kosher s’chach is a wall. Although the Chachamim disagree, the
minority, this would not be a sufficient gemara cites other versions in which their
solution. Even if there is more kosher s’chach, opinions are reversed, and accordingly, the
it is this woven s’chach which supports it, and halacha follows the stringent opinion - that an
would therefore be prohibited. angled tent does not have the status of an
‘ohel’ - which is the opinion of R’ Eliezer
141. Although the words of the Chayei according to the mishna’s record of the
Adam here are his own and lack elaboration, dispute.
he likely means that since the woven mats
serve as a ‘ma’amid’ which does not invalidate 143. The gemara there qualifies that if the
the succah, it cannot be included in the s’chach is lifted off the ground one tefach then
gezeiras tikrah. it is valid. The same applies if one distances
the top edge of the s’chach from the wall it
142. The mishna (Succah 19b) teaches that leans on. Rashi explains that we apply the rule
273